BACKGROUND: The frequency of nonpalpable breast cancer has doubled in the last 10 years. Surgical use of high quality portable ultrasound units has made it possible to evaluate the time-saving method of intraoperative ultrasonography localization. METHODS: Ultrasonography localization in the operating room immediately prior to definitive surgery was performed by the surgeon. All tissue underwent specimen mammography and ink orientation. The presence of negative margins, the closest margins, the need for reexcision, and the cosmetic result were examined for each patient. RESULTS: Ultrasonography correctly localized all breast cancers at surgery (100% sensitivity). Negative margins for invasive carcinoma were found in 90% of patients. Negative margins were at least 10 mm in 27%, at least 5 mm in 62%, and at least 1 mm in 90%. Positive margins were due to the presence of noncalcified ductal carcinoma in-situ (4 of 10) or multifocal invasive disease (6 of 10) noted at final histology. Reexcisions were performed in 9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical use of intraoperative ultrasonography for localization of breast cancer is accurate and efficient. Ultrasonography localization is easier on the patient, is time and cost efficient, and convenient to schedule. Surgeons should embrace this new skill and utilize this tool whenever a nonpalpable breast cancer can be seen with ultrasonography.
BACKGROUND: The frequency of nonpalpable breast cancer has doubled in the last 10 years. Surgical use of high quality portable ultrasound units has made it possible to evaluate the time-saving method of intraoperative ultrasonography localization. METHODS: Ultrasonography localization in the operating room immediately prior to definitive surgery was performed by the surgeon. All tissue underwent specimen mammography and ink orientation. The presence of negative margins, the closest margins, the need for reexcision, and the cosmetic result were examined for each patient. RESULTS: Ultrasonography correctly localized all breast cancers at surgery (100% sensitivity). Negative margins for invasive carcinoma were found in 90% of patients. Negative margins were at least 10 mm in 27%, at least 5 mm in 62%, and at least 1 mm in 90%. Positive margins were due to the presence of noncalcified ductal carcinoma in-situ (4 of 10) or multifocal invasive disease (6 of 10) noted at final histology. Reexcisions were performed in 9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical use of intraoperative ultrasonography for localization of breast cancer is accurate and efficient. Ultrasonography localization is easier on the patient, is time and cost efficient, and convenient to schedule. Surgeons should embrace this new skill and utilize this tool whenever a nonpalpable breast cancer can be seen with ultrasonography.
Authors: Nicole M A Krekel; Barbara M Zonderhuis; Hermien W H Schreurs; Alexander M F Lopes Cardozo; Herman Rijna; Henk van der Veen; Sandra Muller; Pieter Poortman; Louise de Widt; Wilfred K de Roos; Anne Marie Bosch; Annette H M Taets van Amerongen; Elisabeth Bergers; Mecheline H M van der Linden; Elly S M de Lange de Klerk; Henri A H Winters; Sybren Meijer; Petrousjka M P van den Tol Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 2.102