Literature DB >> 14553846

The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Melvin J Silverstein1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The original Van Nuys prognostic index (VNPI) was introduced in 1996 as an aid to the complex treatment decision-making process for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. This update adds patient age to the previous predictors of local recurrence in breast preservation patients.
METHODS: A prospective database consisting of 706 conservatively patients with DCIS was examined using multivariate analysis. Four independent predictors of local recurrence (tumor size, margin width, pathologic classification, and age) were used to derive a new formula for the University of Southern California (USC)/VNPI.
RESULTS: In all, 706 patients with pure DCIS were treated with breast preservation. There was no statistical difference in the 12-year local recurrence-free survival in patients with USC/VNPI scores of 4, 5, or 6, regardless of whether or not radiation therapy was used (P = not significant). Patients with USC/VNPI scores of 7, 8, or 9 received a statistically significant average 12% to 15% local recurrence-free survival benefit when treated with radiation therapy (P = 0.03). Patients with scores of 10, 11, or 12, although showing the greatest absolute benefit from radiation therapy, experienced local recurrence rates of almost 50% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Ductal carcinoma in situ patients with USC/VNPI scores of 4, 5 or 6 can be considered for treatment with excision only. Patients with intermediate scores (7, 8, or 9) should be considered for treatment with radiation therapy or be reexcised if margin width is less than 10 mm and cosmetically feasible. Patients with USC/VNPI scores of 10, 11, or 12 exhibit extremely high local recurrence rates, regardless of irradiation, and should be considered for mastectomy, generally with immediate reconstruction or reexcision if technically possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14553846     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00265-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  69 in total

Review 1.  Choosing treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: fine tuning the University of Southern California/Van Nuys Prognostic Index.

Authors:  Melvin J Silverstein; Michael D Lagios
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Value of pre-operative breast MRI for the size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Francesca Proulx; José A Correa; Romuald Ferré; Atilla Omeroglu; Ann Aldis; Sarkis Meterissian; Benoît Mesurolle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Young age is not associated with increased local recurrence for DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Gary M Freedman; Tianyu Li; Penny R Anderson; Ramona Swaby; Nicos Nicolaou; Lori Goldstein; Elin R Sigurdson; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge; Peter R Eby; Wendy B Demartini; Robert L Gutierrez; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  HER2-Overexpressing Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Increased Risk of Ipsilateral Invasive Recurrence, Receptor Discordance with Recurrence.

Authors:  Thomas J O'Keefe; Sarah L Blair; Ava Hosseini; Olivier Harismendy; Anne M Wallace
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-06-03

6.  Radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Rinaa S Punglia; Harold J Burstein; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  [Prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ].

Authors:  A Lebeau
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and older women with DCIS.

Authors:  Rosalinda Alvarado; Sara A Lari; Robert E Roses; Benjamin D Smith; Wei Yang; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Banu K Arun; Anthony Lucci; Gildy V Babiera; Jamie L Wagner; Abigail S Caudle; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Rosa F Hwang; Isabelle Bedrosian; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Benefit of tamoxifen in estrogen receptor positive DCIS of the breast.

Authors:  Petrelli Fausto; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2012-05

10.  Low CD10 mRNA expression identifies high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Jérôme Toussaint; Virginie Durbecq; Sevilay Altintas; Valérie Doriath; Ghizlane Rouas; Marianne Paesmans; Philippe Bedard; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Wiebren A Tjalma; Denis Larsimont; Martine Piccart; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.