Literature DB >> 14552802

Experience-dependent visual cue recalibration based on discrepancies between visual and haptic percepts.

Joseph E Atkins1, Robert A Jacobs, David C Knill.   

Abstract

We studied the hypothesis that observers can recalibrate their visual percepts when visual and haptic (touch) cues are discordant and the haptic information is judged to be reliable. Using a novel visuo-haptic virtual reality environment, we conducted a set of experiments in which subjects interacted with scenes consisting of two fronto-parallel surfaces. Subjects judged the distance between the two surfaces based on two perceptual cues: a visual stereo cue obtained when viewing the scene binocularly and a haptic cue obtained when subjects grasped the two surfaces between their thumb and index fingers. Visual and haptic cues regarding the scene were manipulated independently so that they could either be consistent or inconsistent. Experiment 1 explored the effect of visuo-haptic inconsistencies on depth-from-stereo estimates. Our findings suggest that when stereo and haptic cues are inconsistent, subjects recalibrate their interpretations of the visual stereo cue so that depth-from-stereo percepts are in greater agreement with depth-from-haptic percepts. In Experiment 2 the visuo-haptic discrepancy took a different form when the two surfaces were near the subject than when they were far from the subject. The results indicate that subjects recalibrated their interpretations of the stereo cue in a context-sensitive manner that depended on viewing distance, thereby making them more consistent with depth-from-haptic estimates at all viewing distances. Together these findings suggest that observers' visual and haptic percepts are tightly coupled in the sense that haptic percepts provide a standard to which visual percepts can be recalibrated when the visual percepts are deemed to be erroneous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14552802     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00470-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability.

Authors:  Adam Zaidel; Amanda H Turner; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Sascha Serwe; Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Karen T Navarro; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-06

4.  Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Ahna R Girshick; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Humans use predictive kinematic models to calibrate visual cues to three-dimensional surface slant.

Authors:  Peter Scarfe; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The role of uncertainty and reward on eye movements in a virtual driving task.

Authors:  Brian T Sullivan; Leif Johnson; Constantin A Rothkopf; Dana Ballard; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Direct and indirect haptic calibration of visual size judgments.

Authors:  Monica Gori; Alessandra Sciutti; David Burr; Giulio Sandini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Use of cues in virtual reality depends on visual feedback.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Fulvio; Bas Rokers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.

Authors:  Chie Takahashi; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Body Orientation Affects the Perceived Size of Objects.

Authors:  John J-J Kim; Meaghan E McManus; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.