Literature DB >> 14552534

Mismatch negativity in evoked brain potentials in adolescents in normal conditions and attention deficit in response to presentation of short-duration acoustic stimuli.

A A Aleksandrov1, N V Karpina, L N Stankevich.   

Abstract

Experiments were performed to measure the critical duration of acoustic stimuli at which the generation of mismatch negativity is still possible in auditory evoked potentials in the human brain, arising in conditions of presentation of standard and deviant stimuli differing in terms of frequency (1000 and 1200 Hz respectively). Studies were performed in two groups of adolescents (aged 11-14 years): 1) those with normal attention characteristics and 2) children with attention deficit. The results showed that normal children had the same critical duration for sound stimuli at which mismatch negativity could be generated as adults. Mismatch negativity still appeared at a stimulus duration of 50 msec, while the mechanism generating mismatch negativity did not operate at durations of 30 and 11 msec. In children with attention deficit, statistically significant mismatch negativity was not seen at all durations of short acoustic stimuli (11, 30, and 50 msec).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14552534     DOI: 10.1023/a:1024408807079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0097-0549


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as a tool for investigating auditory discrimination and sensory memory in infants and children.

Authors:  M Cheour; P H Leppänen; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study.

Authors:  M H Giard; F Perrin; J Pernier; P Bouchet
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  P Paavilainen; D Jiang; J Lavikainen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Volumetric MRI analysis comparing subjects having attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with normal controls.

Authors:  P A Filipek; M Semrud-Clikeman; R J Steingard; P F Renshaw; D N Kennedy; J Biederman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  The test of variables of attention (TOVA) is useful in the diagnosis of Japanese male children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  N Wada; Y Yamashita; T Matsuishi; Y Ohtani; H Kato
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Electrophysiological indices of information processing in methylphenidate responders.

Authors:  B G Winsberg; D C Javitt; G S Silipo
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  F X Castellanos; J N Giedd; W L Marsh; S D Hamburger; A C Vaituzis; D P Dickstein; S E Sarfatti; Y C Vauss; J W Snell; N Lange; D Kaysen; A L Krain; G F Ritchie; J C Rajapakse; J L Rapoport
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1996-07

8.  Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy children and those with attention-deficit or tourette/tic symptoms.

Authors:  R D Oades; A Dittmann-Balcar; R Schepker; C Eggers; D Zerbin
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1996-04-12       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Electrophysiological changes in children with learning and attentional abnormalities as a function of age: event-related potentials to an "oddball" paradigm.

Authors:  Y Frank; J A Seiden; B Napolitano
Journal:  Clin Electroencephalogr       Date:  1998-10

10.  Neurophysiological methods testing the psychoneural basis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  P Uclés; S Lorente; F Rosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.