Literature DB >> 14552392

Screening of exogenous enzymes for ruminant diets: relationship between biochemical characteristics and in vitro ruminal degradation.

D Colombatto1, D P Morgavi, A F Furtado, K A Beauchemin.   

Abstract

With the objective of developing a rational approach for the selection of feed enzymes for ruminants, 22 commercial enzyme products were examined in terms of protein concentration, enzymic activities on model substrates, and hydrolytic capacity, the latter determined from the release of reducing sugars from alfalfa hay and corn silage. An in vitro ruminal degradation assessment was carried out using the same substrates, untreated or treated with the 22 enzyme products at 1.5 microL/g forage DM. Stepwise regressions were then performed to establish relationships between these factors. Protein concentration and enzymic activities explained at least 84% (P < 0.01) of the variation in the release of reducing sugars from alfalfa and corn silage. Alfalfa DM degradation after incubation with ruminal fluid for 18 h was positively related to xylanase activity (R2 = 0.29, P < 0.01), but the same activity was negatively related to DM degradation of corn silage (R2 = 0.19, P < 0.05). Protease activity explained a further 10% of the alfalfa DM degradation (P < 0.10). Following sequential steps involving the determination of rate and extent of DM and fiber degradation, the best candidates for alfalfa and corn silage were selected. Enzyme products effective with alfalfa hay seemed to exert part of their effect during the pretreatment period, whereas enzymes effective with corn silage worked exclusively after ruminal fluid was added. This finding suggests that different modes of action of exogenous enzymes are attacking different substrates and may partly explain enzyme-feed specificity. In alfalfa, it seems that effective enzymes work by removing structural barriers that retard the microbial colonization of digestible fractions, increasing the rate of degradation. In corn silage, effective enzymes seem to interact with ruminal enzymes to degrade the forage more rapidly, which is consistent with previous findings of synergism between exogenous and ruminal enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14552392     DOI: 10.2527/2003.81102628x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Valorizing guava (Psidium guajava L.) seeds through germination-induced carbohydrate changes.

Authors:  Cheng Xian Ling; Ying Ping Chang
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  The Cytosolic Oligosaccharide-Degrading Proteome of Butyrivibrio Proteoclasticus.

Authors:  Jonathan C Dunne; William J Kelly; Sinead C Leahy; Dong Li; Judy J Bond; Lifeng Peng; Graeme T Attwood; T William Jordan
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 3.  Antimicrobial Resistance: Its Surveillance, Impact, and Alternative Management Strategies in Dairy Animals.

Authors:  Chetan Sharma; Namita Rokana; Mudit Chandra; Brij Pal Singh; Rohini Devidas Gulhane; Jatinder Paul Singh Gill; Pallab Ray; Anil Kumar Puniya; Harsh Panwar
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-01-08

4.  In vitro assessment of two novel Cellulases from Trabulsiella odontotermitis for agricultural waste utilization.

Authors:  Martha María Arevalos-Sánchez; Adrián Omar Maynez-Perez; Felipe A Rodríguez-Almeida; José Alfredo Martínez-Quintana; Fidel Alejandro Sanchez-Flores; Monserrath Felix-Portillo; América Chavéz-Martínez; Myrna Elena Olvera-García; Oscar Ruiz-Barrera; Agustín Corral-Luna
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.563

5.  The Fibrolytic Enzyme Profiles and the Composition of Fungal Communities in Donkey Cecum-Colon Ecosystem.

Authors:  Zhenwei Zhang; Yonghui Wang; Bingjian Huang; Mingxia Zhu; Changfa Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.