Literature DB >> 1455232

Consequences of replication fork movement through transcription units in vivo.

S French1.   

Abstract

To examine the basis for the evolutionary selection for codirectionality of replication and transcription in Escherichia coli, electron microscopy was used to visualize replication from an inducible ColE1 replication origin inserted into the Escherichia coli chromosome upstream (5') or downstream (3') of rrnB, a ribosomal RNA operon. Active rrnB operons were replicated either in the same direction in which they were transcribed or in the opposite direction. In either direction, RNA polymerases were dislodged during replication. When replication and transcription were codirectional, the rate of replication fork movement was similar to that observed in nontranscribed regions. When replication and transcription occurred in opposite directions, replication fork movement was reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1455232     DOI: 10.1126/science.1455232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  115 in total

1.  Strand asymmetry and codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of Euglena gracilis.

Authors:  B R Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  RecA-mediated rescue of Escherichia coli strains with replication forks arrested at the terminus.

Authors:  S Maisnier-Patin; K Nordström; S Dasgupta
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Replication-transcription conflicts in bacteria.

Authors:  Houra Merrikh; Yan Zhang; Alan D Grossman; Jue D Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Gene essentiality determines chromosome organisation in bacteria.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Antoine Danchin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Cells defective for replication restart undergo replication fork reversal.

Authors:  Gianfranco Grompone; Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Linking transcription with DNA repair, damage tolerance, and genome duplication.

Authors:  Peter McGlynn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  What happens when replication and transcription complexes collide?

Authors:  Richard T Pomerantz; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Transcription termination maintains chromosome integrity.

Authors:  Robert S Washburn; Max E Gottesman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mechanisms of transcription-replication collisions in bacteria.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Replication fork barriers in the Xenopus rDNA.

Authors:  B Wiesendanger; R Lucchini; T Koller; J M Sogo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.