Literature DB >> 14551596

Bacterial biofilms and implantable prosthetic devices.

A Silverstein1, C F Donatucci.   

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction afflicts millions of men. A group of patients with advanced degeneration of their erectile tissue do not respond to pharmacological therapy, and surgical prosthetic reconstruction represents an attractive and highly satisfying alternative. Yet many men are unwilling to take this step due to fear of infection. Implanted prosthetic devices are at risk for infection because they provide a platform for the development of a bacterial biofilm, an organized bacterial colony that grows on the surface of the implanted material. The biofilm is resistant to all efforts to eradicate it short of removal of the foreign material. Bacteria may attach to the surface of the foreign material by surface charge attraction, hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions, and by specific attachment by fimbrae. Growth, colonization, and maturation follow bacterial attachment. A mature biofilm is composed of three layers: a linking film binding the biofilm to the surface; a base film made up of a compact layer of bacteria; and a surface film from which free-floating bacteria can arise and spread. The majority of the surface layer is made up of exopolysaccharide matrix. Bacteria deep within the biofilm matrix live in a protected environment; diffusion of antibiotics is difficult, low oxygen tension leads to a lower bacterial metabolic rate rendering the bacteria functionally resistant to high levels of antibiotics. Effective strategies to reduce prosthetic infection levels must rely on the prevention of biofilm formation through surface modification. Possible mechanisms include the addition of antimicrobials to the surface of the device, or chemical modifications, which reduces bacterial attachment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14551596     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  6 in total

1.  Skin and bone integrated prosthetic pylon: a pilot animal study.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin; Grigory Raykhtsaum; Oleg V Galibin; Mikhail V Protasov; Julie V Chihovskaya; Irina G Belyaeva
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

2.  Manganese dioxide coating reduces bacterial adhesion and infection in silicon implants in animal model.

Authors:  Lucas Mira Gon; Caio César Citatini de Campos; Eduardo Riccetto; Carlos Emílio Levy; Osvaldo Griguol; Cássio Luís Zanettini Riccetto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Penile prosthesis coating and the reduction of postoperative infection.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 4.  The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants.

Authors:  Matthew Faller; Tobias Kohler
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-04-18

Review 5.  A scoping review of penile implant biofilms-what do we know and what remains unknown?

Authors:  Joon Yau Leong; Courtney E Capella; Maria J D'Amico; Selin Isguven; Caroline Purtill; Priscilla Machado; Lauren J Delaney; Gerard D Henry; Noreen J Hickok; Flemming Forsberg; Paul H Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-08

6.  Both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans Accumulate Greater Biomass in Dual-Species Biofilms under Flow.

Authors:  Swetha Kasetty; Dallas L Mould; Deborah A Hogan; Carey D Nadell
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.389

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.