Literature DB >> 14551275

De novo placement of button gastrostomy catheters in an adult population: experience in 53 patients.

Stuart M Lyon1, Philip J Haslam, Deirdre M Duke, Frank P McGrath, Michael J Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of primary button gastrostomy insertion with the aid of T-fastener gastropexy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients (33 men, 20 women; mean age, 63.4 years) referred for percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) underwent primary button gastrostomy insertion over an 18-month period in two centers. Nine of the patients (17%) were referred after failed endoscopic gastrostomy and 44 (83%) were primarily referred for PRG. Indications for gastrostomy included esophageal/head and neck malignancy (n = 33) and neurologic disorders (n = 20). Gastropexy with three or four T-fasteners was performed in all patients and angioplasty balloon catheters (6 mm x 40 mm) were used to measure tract length and dilate the tract. An 18-F dilator was used for final tract dilation. Button gastrostomy catheters with retention balloons were inserted in all patients. Patient follow-up was performed by the department of dietetics, which contacted patients on a weekly basis.
RESULTS: Primary button gastrostomy insertion was successful in 52 of 53 patients (98%). The mean gastrostomy button catheter survival was 13.3 weeks (range, 1-28 weeks). No episodes of button occlusion occurred. Since the beginning of this study, 33 patients (63%) have had their gastrostomy buttons replaced. The reasons for button replacement include burst retention balloons (n = 27; 52%), dislodgment of the catheter (n = 4; 8%), and continuing pain/discomfort at the gastrostomy site (n = 2; 4%).
CONCLUSION: Button-type gastrostomy catheters can be placed de novo by interventional radiologists without the need for a mature tract, provided a T-fastener gastropexy is used. The balloon retention button devices are not compromised by occlusion but do tend to become dislodged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14551275     DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000092901.73329.eb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

1.  New approaches to percutaneous gastrostomy.

Authors:  Mariana O'Dowd; M Fredrick Given; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy.

Authors:  Stuart M Lyon; Diane M Pascoe
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Updates on percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy and jejunostomy.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Shin; Auh-Whan Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.519

4.  De novo radiologic placement of button gastrostomy: a feasibility study in children with cancer.

Authors:  Bertrand Richioud; Typhaine Louazon; Hedi Beji; Amandine Bertrand; Pascale Roux; Anne-Charlotte Kalenderian; Marie Cuinet; Frank Pilleul; Perrine Marec-Bérard
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-26

5.  Mushroom-cage gastrostomy tube placement in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a 5-year experience in 104 patients in a single institution.

Authors:  Dylan Lewis; Mary-Ann Ampong; Alan Rio; Emma Willey; Julia Johnson; Christopher E Shaw; Catherine M Ellis; Ammar Al-Chalabi; P Nigel Leigh; Paul S Sidhu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.