Literature DB >> 14550964

A model of two-stage newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response.

Satoshi Iwasaki1, Yasuhiro Hayashi, Atsurou Seki, Mituyoshi Nagura, Yasuyuki Hashimoto, Goro Oshima, Tomoyuki Hoshino.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to evaluate a two-stage newborn hearing screening program using automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) before discharge and to describe our follow-up program. This study used 4085 infants born in the Seirei-Hamamatsu and Mikatahara General Hospitals during a 2-year period. The initial screening test was performed 2 or 3 days after birth at an intensity of 35 dBnHL. For the infants who were referred from this test, the re-screening test was performed 5 or 6 days after birth. Diagnostic work-up with auditory brainstem response (ABR), otoacoustic emissions (OAE), and a conditioned orientation reflex audiometry (COR) test were performed by the age of 3-6 months. The referral rate was 1.20% (49/4085 infants) in the first test and 0.71% (29/4085 infants) in the two-stage screening. The two-stage screening procedure was able to reduce the false-positive rate from 0.83 to 0.34%. The incidence of bilateral and unilateral congenital hearing loss diagnosed by ABR was 8/4085 (0.20%) infants and 7/4085 (0.17%) infants, respectively. One infant with congenital cytomegalovirus infection, who passed the two-stage AABR tests, was diagnosed with hearing loss 1 month after birth, using ABR. The two-stage measurement of AABR is effective and time efficient due to significant decreases in the referral rate and the false-positive rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14550964     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(03)00199-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  12 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcome: a review.

Authors:  Carla Arpino; Eliana Compagnone; Maria L Montanaro; Denise Cacciatore; Angela De Luca; Angelica Cerulli; Stefano Di Girolamo; Paolo Curatolo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response in a multi-stage infant hearing screening.

Authors:  Luca Guastini; Renzo Mora; Massimo Dellepiane; Valentina Santomauro; Massimiliano Mora; Antonio Rocca; Angelo Salami
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Challenges of Implementing Universal Newborn Hearing Screening at a Tertiary Care Centre from India.

Authors:  Shuchita Gupta; Sandhya Sah; Tapas Som; Manju Saksena; Chander Prakash Yadav; M Jeeva Sankar; Alok Thakar; Ramesh Agarwal; Ashok K Deorari; Vinod K Paul
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Screening of Newborn Hearing at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.

Authors:  Hosaagrahara Subbegowda Satish; Ramabhadraiah Anil Kumar; Borlingegowda Viswanatha
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-07-16

6.  ABR obtained from time-efficient train stimuli for cisplatin ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Marilyn F Dille; Roger M Ellingson; Garnett P McMillan; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China.

Authors:  Haibin Sheng; Qian Zhou; Qixuan Wang; Yun Yu; Lihua Liu; Meie Liang; Xueyan Zhou; Hao Wu; Xiangrong Tang; Zhiwu Huang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Identifying congenital hearing impairment: preliminary results from a comparative study using objective and subjective audiometric protocols.

Authors:  A Ciorba; S Hatzopoulos; J Petruccelli; M Mazzoli; A Pastore; K Kochanek; P Skarzynski; A Wlodarczyk; H Skarzynski
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Audiological Follow-up Results after Newborn Hearing Screening Program.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Lim; Ellen Ai-Rhan Kim; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  The specificity and sensitivity of transient otoacustic emission in neonatal hearing screening compared with diagnostic test of auditory brain stem response in tehran hospitals.

Authors:  Jaleh Yousefi; Mohammad Ajalloueyan; Susan Amirsalari; Mahdieh Hassanali Fard
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.