M E Kruijshaar1, N Hoeymans, R V Bijl, J Spijker, M L Essink-Bot. 1. Department for Public Health Forecasting, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. kruijshaar@mgz.fgg.eur.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Information on the distribution of disability associated with major depression (MD) across different groups of patients is of interest to health policy and planning. We examined the associations of severity and type (a single or recurrent episode) of MD with disability in a Dutch general population sample. METHODS: We used data from the first wave (1996) of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). MD 'severity' and 'type' were diagnosed with the help of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview according to DSM-III-R criteria. SF-36 scores, days ill in bed and days absent from work were taken as indicators of disability. The differences in these variables were studied by means of variance and regression analysis. RESULTS: Recurrent MD was found not to be associated with more disability than single episode MD. Higher 'severity' classes were associated with more disability. However, the degree of disability between 'moderate' and 'severe' MD differed only very slightly. The difference in disability between non-depressed and mildly depressed individuals had a larger effect than between each successive pair of 'severity' classes. CONCLUSIONS: Three groups of MD can be distinguished based on the associated degree of disability: 'mild', 'moderate to severe' and 'severe with psychotic features'. In the future, these groups can be used to describe the distribution of disability in the depressed population. The marked difference between 'mild' MD and no MD suggests that 'mild' cases should be considered relevant.
BACKGROUND: Information on the distribution of disability associated with major depression (MD) across different groups of patients is of interest to health policy and planning. We examined the associations of severity and type (a single or recurrent episode) of MD with disability in a Dutch general population sample. METHODS: We used data from the first wave (1996) of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). MD 'severity' and 'type' were diagnosed with the help of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview according to DSM-III-R criteria. SF-36 scores, days ill in bed and days absent from work were taken as indicators of disability. The differences in these variables were studied by means of variance and regression analysis. RESULTS: Recurrent MD was found not to be associated with more disability than single episode MD. Higher 'severity' classes were associated with more disability. However, the degree of disability between 'moderate' and 'severe' MD differed only very slightly. The difference in disability between non-depressed and mildly depressed individuals had a larger effect than between each successive pair of 'severity' classes. CONCLUSIONS: Three groups of MD can be distinguished based on the associated degree of disability: 'mild', 'moderate to severe' and 'severe with psychotic features'. In the future, these groups can be used to describe the distribution of disability in the depressed population. The marked difference between 'mild' MD and no MD suggests that 'mild' cases should be considered relevant.
Authors: Kathleen S Bingham; Ellen M Whyte; Benoit H Mulsant; Anthony J Rothschild; Matthew V Rudorfer; Patricia Marino; Samprit Banerjee; Meryl A Butters; George S Alexopoulos; Barnett S Meyers; Alastair J Flint Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Tina Zhu; Vincenzo De Luca; Laura Ashley Gallaugher; Hanna O Woldeyohannes; Joanna K Soczynska; Sarah Szymkowicz; David J Muzina; Sidney H Kennedy; Roger S McIntyre Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Berend Terluin; Willem van Rhenen; Johannes R Anema; Toon W Taris Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2011-04-09 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Annemieke van Straten; Pim Cuijpers; Florence J van Zuuren; Niels Smits; Marianne Donker Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Rob Hoedeman; Fransina J de Jong; Jolanda Ac Meeuwissen; Hanneke W Drewes; Niels C van der Laan; Herman J Adèr Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Louise Balfour; Curtis Cooper; John Kowal; Giorgio A Tasca; Amy Silverman; Marie Kane; Gary Garber Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Stephan Köhler; Theresa Unger; Sabine Hoffmann; Arthur Mackert; Barbara Ross; Thomas Fydrich Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Moniek C Vlasveld; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Johannes R Anema; Willem van Mechelen; Aartjan T F Beekman; Harm W J van Marwijk; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2013-09
Authors: Sarah Wilke; Daisy J A Janssen; Emiel F M Wouters; Jos M G A Schols; Frits M E Franssen; Martijn A Spruit Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: S E Lagerveld; U Bültmann; R L Franche; F J H van Dijk; M C Vlasveld; C M van der Feltz-Cornelis; D J Bruinvels; J J J M Huijs; R W B Blonk; J J L van der Klink; K Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2010-09