Literature DB >> 14550735

Standardization of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the horse.

H Nollet1, L Van Ham, J Dewulf, G Vanderstraeten, P Deprez.   

Abstract

The influence of coil position on the peak-to-peak amplitude and onset latency of transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (MMEPs) in the extensor carpi radialis and cranial tibial muscles of horses was evaluated. Seven different stimulating coil positions were obtained by constructing a frame on the forehead. Two stimulation intensities (80% and 100% of maximal stimulator output) and two different coil currents (clockwise and counter-clockwise) were tested. For both recording sites MMEPs with the shortest onset latency and the largest peak-to-peak amplitude were detected when the coil was placed in the median of the forehead. There was no significant difference between left and right side recordings. The direction of the current flow in the coil had no influence on the onset latency of the MMEPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14550735     DOI: 10.1016/s1090-0233(03)00024-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  7 in total

1.  Extramuscular Recording of Spontaneous EMG Activity and Transcranial Electrical Elicited Motor Potentials in Horses: Characteristics of Different Subcutaneous and Surface Electrode Types and Practical Guidelines.

Authors:  Sanne Lotte Journée; Henricus Louis Journée; Stephen Michael Reed; Hanneke Irene Berends; Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn; Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Comparison of Muscle MEPs From Transcranial Magnetic and Electrical Stimulation and Appearance of Reflexes in Horses.

Authors:  Sanne Lotte Journée; Henricus Louis Journée; Hanneke Irene Berends; Steven Michael Reed; Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn; Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses.

Authors:  Sanne Lotte Journée; Henricus Louis Journée; Hanneke Irene Berends; Steven Michael Reed; Wilhelmina Bergmann; Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn; Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Accuracy of transcranial magnetic stimulation and a Bayesian latent class model for diagnosis of spinal cord dysfunction in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Els Raes; Sebastien Buczinski; Michèle Dumoulin; Piet Deprez; Luc Van Ham; Gunther van Loon; Bart Pardon
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation (TES): normative data for motor evoked potentials in healthy horses.

Authors:  Sanne Lotte Journée; Henricus Louis Journée; Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn; Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Magnetic motor evoked potentials of cervical muscles in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Bart Pardon; Luc Van Ham; Philip Joosten; Gunther van Loon; Piet Deprez
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Determination of magnetic motor evoked potential latency time cutoff values for detection of spinal cord dysfunction in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Bart Pardon; Veronique Saey; Els Raes; Luc Van Ham; Richard Ducatelle; Gunther van Loon; Piet Deprez
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.