Literature DB >> 14550324

Time to eat: the relationship between the number of people eating and meal duration in three lunch settings.

Rick Bell1, Patricia L Pliner.   

Abstract

We conducted an observational study of customers in three different types of lunch settings: a worksite cafeteria, a fast-food restaurant, and a moderately priced restaurant, and assessed the relationship between meal duration and the number of people eating at each table (group size). Results suggest a significant positive correlation between group size and meal duration, collapsing over eating settings. Analysis of variance yielded significant main effects of both eating setting and of group size, indicating that meal durations were longest in the moderately priced restaurant and shortest in the fast-food restaurant. An interaction between group size and eating setting indicates that the magnitude of the group size effect on meal duration differed in the different situations, with the effect of group size on duration being smallest, but still significant, in the fast-food setting compared with the other two settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14550324     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00109-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  10 in total

1.  Effects of social contexts on overweight and normal-weight children's food intake.

Authors:  Sarah-Jeanne Salvy; Jennifer S Coelho; Elizabeth Kieffer; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-06-20

2.  Eating practices and diet quality: a population study of four Nordic countries.

Authors:  L Holm; T B Lund; M Niva
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Behavioral Modification for the Management of Obesity.

Authors:  Claire P Kelley; Geena Sbrocco; Tracy Sbrocco
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.907

4.  Eating in larger groups increases food consumption.

Authors:  Julie C Lumeng; Katherine H Hillman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Broad Themes of Difference between French and Americans in Attitudes to Food and Other Life Domains: Personal Versus Communal Values, Quantity Versus Quality, and Comforts Versus Joys.

Authors:  Paul Rozin; Abigail K Remick; Claude Fischler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-26

6.  Health, happiness and eating together: what can a large Thai cohort study tell us?

Authors:  Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan; Cathy Banwell; Wakako Takeda; Jane Dixon; Sam-Ang Seubsman; Adrian C Sleigh
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-01-14

7.  Socioeconomic Differences and the Potential Role of Tribes in Young People's Food and Drink Purchasing Outside School at Lunchtime.

Authors:  Ariadne Beatrice Kapetanaki; Wendy J Wills; Giada Danesi; Neil H Spencer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Digital Commensality: Eating and Drinking in the Company of Technology.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Maurizio Mancini; Gijs Huisman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 9.  Computational Commensality: From Theories to Computational Models for Social Food Preparation and Consumption in HCI.

Authors:  Radoslaw Niewiadomski; Eleonora Ceccaldi; Gijs Huisman; Gualtiero Volpe; Maurizio Mancini
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-12-05

10.  Influences of Product Temperature on Emotional Responses to, and Sensory Attributes of, Coffee and Green Tea Beverages.

Authors:  Ragita C Pramudya; Han-Seok Seo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.