Literature DB >> 14534782

Effectiveness of six species of rodents as dispersers of singleleaf piñon pine (Pinus monophylla).

Jennifer L Hollander1, Stephen B Vander Wall.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of six species of rodents as dispersers of singleleaf piñon pine (Pinus monophylla) was investigated in field enclosures. The rodent species were Panamint kangaroo rat (Dipodomys panamintinus), Great Basin pocket mouse (Perognathus parvus), pinyon mouse (Peromyscus truei), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), least chipmunk (Tamias minimus), and white-tailed antelope ground squirrel (Ammospermophilus leucurus). Five measures of seed harvesting and caching behavior were assessed and used to calculate the effect of species on the probability of effective dispersal (i.e., movement of seeds to potential establishment sites) of piñon pine seeds. These measures were proportion of seeds harvested, proportion of harvested seeds that were scatter hoarded, relative dispersion of scatter-hoarded seeds, seedling emergence and seedling establishment. To evaluate the effects of the last two variables, a 2-year study of seed germination and seedling establishment was conducted in the field. Seedling survival was 72-90% for seedlings emerging from 1-4 cm deep but was markedly lower from surface caches and for depths >4 cm. All seedlings in the open microsite perished before the end of the first year, whereas 38-97% of seedlings under shrubs survived. Cache size did not affect seedling survival over the 2 years, but large caches reduced the total number of potential establishment sites. All six species harvested over 90% of the piñon seeds presented and scatter hoarded from 31% (pocket mouse) to 66% (chipmunk) of the seeds they harvested. Piñon mice and deer mice distributed seeds to more cache sites (i.e., put fewer seeds in caches) than the other species and, consequently, created more potential establishment sites. All species scatter hoarded seeds at depths suitable for seedling emergence, but pocket mice and piñon mice cached under shrubs more than the other species, the microhabitat where seedlings had the greatest probability of establishing. Factors that had the greatest effect on the probability of effective dispersal were microhabitat selection and cache size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534782     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1393-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Scatter-and clump-dispersal and seedling demography: hypothesis and implications.

Authors:  H F Howe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The central role of Clark's nutcracker in the dispersal and establishment of whitebark pine.

Authors:  H E Hutchins; R M Lanner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in operant tests of nonspatial and spatial memory.

Authors:  D J Olson; A C Kamil; R P Balda; P J Nims
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Food caching and differential cache pilferage: a field study of coexistence of sympatric kangaroo rats and pocket mice.

Authors:  Lisa A Leaver; Martin Daly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effectiveness of three turacos as seed dispersers in a tropical montane forest.

Authors:  Chin Sun; Anthony R Ives; Hans J Kraeuter; Timothy C Moermond
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A model of caching depth: implications for scatter hoarders and plant dispersal.

Authors:  S B Vander Wall
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.926

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Effectiveness of rodents as local seed dispersers of Holm oaks.

Authors:  José M Gómez; Carolina Puerta-Piñero; Eugene W Schupp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A seed predator drives the evolution of a seed dispersal mutualism.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Craig W Benkman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Seed trait-mediated selection by rodents affects mutualistic interactions and seedling recruitment of co-occurring tree species.

Authors:  Hongmao Zhang; Chuan Yan; Gang Chang; Zhibin Zhang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Does scatter-hoarding of seeds benefit cache owners or pilferers?

Authors:  Haifeng Gu; Qingjian Zhao; Zhibin Zhang
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.654

5.  Enemy release from the effects of generalist granivores can facilitate Bromus tectorum invasion in the Great Basin Desert.

Authors:  Jacob E Lucero; Urs Schaffner; Ghorbanali Asadi; Alireza Bagheri; Toshpulot Rajabov; Ragan M Callaway
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Behavior-specific occurrence patterns of Pinyon Jays (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) in three Great Basin study areas and significance for pinyon-juniper woodland management.

Authors:  John D Boone; Chris Witt; Elisabeth M Ammon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does animal-mediated seed dispersal facilitate the formation of Pinus armandii-Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forests?

Authors:  Fei Yu; Dexiang Wang; Xianfeng Yi; Xiaoxiao Shi; Yakun Huang; Hongwu Zhang; XinPing Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The comparative effectiveness of rodents and dung beetles as local seed dispersers in Mediterranean oak forests.

Authors:  Ignacio M Pérez-Ramos; José R Verdú; Catherine Numa; Teodoro Marañón; Jorge M Lobo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.