Literature DB >> 14534769

Modeling variability in cortical representations of human complex sound perception.

D L Miglioretti1, D Boatman.   

Abstract

This study investigated methodological (task, stimulus) and intersubject variability in the cortical representation of auditory processing of complex sounds, including speech. Subjects were adult seizure patients undergoing left hemisphere electrocortical mapping (ECM). We tested auditory discrimination of complex sounds, including frequency-modulated tones and speech syllables (digitized, synthesized) contrasted by phonetic features and lexical status. To measure task effects, auditory comprehension was also tested. Within- and across-patient differences in the distribution of deficits induced by ECM were modeled statistically using the recently developed method of Template Mixture Modeling. Cortical representations of auditory discrimination were smaller, more localized, and less variable across subjects than auditory comprehension. Stimulus effects were observed only for speech-tone contrasts. When tasks and stimuli were held constant, two auditory discrimination centers were identified in the posterior temporal lobe. There was also an interaction between task and intersubject effects, with more intersubject variability in cortical maps of auditory comprehension than auditory discrimination. These results demonstrate the utility of using the statistical modeling approach of Template Mixture Modeling to quantify sources of variability in cortical functional organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534769     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1703-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Functional roles of Broca's area and SMG: evidence from cortical stimulation mapping in a deaf signer.

Authors:  D P Corina; S L McBurney; C Dodrill; K Hinshaw; J Brinkley; G Ojemann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Comparison of fMRI and intraoperative direct cortical stimulation in localization of receptive language areas.

Authors:  J T Lurito; M J Lowe; C Sartorius; V P Mathews
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Role of anterior temporal cortex in auditory sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.

Authors:  C Humphries; K Willard; B Buchsbaum; G Hickok
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval.

Authors:  R Wise; F Chollet; U Hadar; K Friston; E Hoffner; R Frackowiak
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  The cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  B M Mazoyer; N Tzourio; V Frak; A Syrota; N Murayama; O Levrier; G Salamon; S Dehaene; L Cohen; J Mehler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Right hemisphere speech perception revealed by amobarbital injection and electrical interference.

Authors:  D Boatman; J Hart; R P Lesser; N Honeycutt; N B Anderson; D Miglioretti; B Gordon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Left-hemisphere specialization for the processing of acoustic transients.

Authors:  I S Johnsrude; R J Zatorre; B A Milner; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Language representation in the human brain: evidence from cortical mapping.

Authors:  S C Bhatnagar; G T Mandybur; H W Buckingham; O J Andy
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Neuroperceptual differences in consonant and vowel discrimination: as revealed by direct cortical electrical interference.

Authors:  D Boatman; C Hall; M H Goldstein; R Lesser; B Gordon
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Individual variability in cortical localization of language.

Authors:  G A Ojemann
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  10 in total

1.  Predicting shifts in generalization gradients with perceptrons.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Milen L Radell; Lauren M Guillette; Christopher B Sturdy; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  The cortical organization of speech processing: feedback control and predictive coding the context of a dual-stream model.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  The functional neuroanatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Spatiotemporal imaging of cortical activation during verb generation and picture naming.

Authors:  Erik Edwards; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Sarang S Dalal; Ryan T Canolty; Heidi E Kirsch; Nicholas M Barbaro; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Wernicke's area revisited: parallel streams and word processing.

Authors:  Iain DeWitt; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Intracranial mapping of auditory perception: event-related responses and electrocortical stimulation.

Authors:  A Sinai; N E Crone; H M Wied; P J Franaszczuk; D Miglioretti; D Boatman-Reich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Quantifying auditory event-related responses in multichannel human intracranial recordings.

Authors:  Dana Boatman-Reich; Piotr J Franaszczuk; Anna Korzeniewska; Brian Caffo; Eva K Ritzl; Sarah Colwell; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Parallel versus serial processing dependencies in the perisylvian speech network: a Granger analysis of intracranial EEG data.

Authors:  David W Gow; Corey J Keller; Emad Eskandar; Nate Meng; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Cortical sites critical for speech discrimination in normal and impaired listeners.

Authors:  Dana F Boatman; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 6.709

10.  Improved Speech Hearing in Noise with Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Prachi Patel; Bahar Khalijhinejad; Jose L Herrero; Stephan Bickel; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 6.709

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.