Literature DB >> 14534646

Medicine and aviation: a review of the comparison.

R Randell1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to understand the nature of medical error in highly technological environments and argues that a comparison with aviation can blur its real understanding.
METHODS: This study is a comparative study between the notion of error in health care and aviation based on the author's own ethnographic study in intensive care units and findings from the research literature on errors in aviation. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Failures in the use of medical technology are common. In attempts to understand the area of medical error, much attention has focused on how we can learn from aviation. This paper argues that such a comparison is not always useful, on the basis that (i) the type of work and technology is very different in the two domains; (ii) different issues are involved in training and procurement; and (iii) attitudes to error vary between the domains. Therefore, it is necessary to look closely at the subject of medical error and resolve those questions left unanswered by the lessons of aviation.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  3 in total

Review 1.  Translational cognition for decision support in critical care environments: a review.

Authors:  Vimla L Patel; Jiajie Zhang; Nicole A Yoskowitz; Robert Green; Osman R Sayan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  That's the Way We Do Things Around Here!: Your Actions Speak Louder Than Words When It Comes To Patient Safety.

Authors:  Matthew Grissinger
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-05

3.  Job characteristics in nursing and cognitive failure at work.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Simone Grebner; Anna Dudan
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.