Literature DB >> 14534182

MCMC genome rearrangement.

István Miklós1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: As more and more genomes have been sequenced, genomic data is rapidly accumulating. Genome-wide mutations are believed more neutral than local mutations such as substitutions, insertions and deletions, therefore phylogenetic investigations based on inversions, transpositions and inverted transpositions are less biased by the hypothesis on neutral evolution. Although efficient algorithms exist for obtaining the inversion distance of two signed permutations, there is no reliable algorithm when both inversions and transpositions are considered. Moreover, different type of mutations happen with different rates, and it is not clear how to weight them in a distance based approach.
RESULTS: We introduce a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to genome rearrangement based on a stochastic model of evolution, which can estimate the number of different evolutionary events needed to sort a signed permutation. The performance of the method was tested on simulated data, and the estimated numbers of different types of mutations were reliable. Human and Drosophila mitochondrial data were also analysed with the new method. The mixing time of the Markov Chain is short both in terms of CPU times and number of proposals. AVAILABILITY: The source code in C is available on request from the author.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534182     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  8 in total

1.  Recovering genome rearrangements in the mammalian phylogeny.

Authors:  Hao Zhao; Guillaume Bourque
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Sampling solution traces for the problem of sorting permutations by signed reversals.

Authors:  Christian Baudet; Zanoni Dias; Marie-France Sagot
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  Seevolution: visualizing chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Andrés Esteban-Marcos; Aaron E Darling; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Dependence of paracentric inversion rate on tract length.

Authors:  Thomas L York; Rick Durrett; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Modelling prokaryote gene content.

Authors:  Matthew Spencer; Edward Susko; Andrew J Roger
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 1.625

6.  Dynamics of genome rearrangement in bacterial populations.

Authors:  Aaron E Darling; István Miklós; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Probabilistic models for CRISPR spacer content evolution.

Authors:  Anne Kupczok; Jonathan P Bollback
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Sampling and counting genome rearrangement scenarios.

Authors:  István Miklós; Heather Smith
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.