Literature DB >> 14533962

Endovascular treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome: is bilateral wallstent placement superior to unilateral placement?

Hans-Peter Dinkel1, Birgit Mettke, Felix Schmid, Iris Baumgartner, Jürgen Triller, Dai-Do Do.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report our experience with unilateral versus bilateral stent placement in the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).
METHODS: The records and films of 84 consecutive patients (69 men; mean age 64+/-10 years, range 39-79) referred for stent placement in malignant SVCS were reviewed for venous compromise, technical and clinical success, complications, and reocclusions. Wallstents were placed covering the SVC and both (bilateral technique) brachiocephalic veins (BCV) preferentially; unilateral stenting of only one BCV in addition to the SVC was performed based on operator preference or inability to access both sides. Technical success was defined as the ability to stent the SVC and at least one BCV; clinical success was the elimination of SVCS symptoms.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 83 (99%) patients, using the unilateral technique in 22 and bilateral stenting in 61 patients. The groups did not differ with regard to age, sex, underlying diseases, or location and extent of venous compromise. Immediate clinical success was achieved in 20 (91%) of 22 patients in the unilateral group and 55 (90%) of 61 patients in the bilateral group. Two patients suffered late occlusion in the unilateral group, while in the bilateral group, 8 patients had early occlusion and 9 had late occlusion. Thus, the total occlusion rate was significantly (p<0.05) lower in the unilateral group. There was 1 other complication (pericardial tamponade) in the bilateral group, for a 28% total complication rate, which was significantly higher (p=0.039) than the 9% in the unilateral group. The 1, 3, 6, and 12-month primary stent patency rates were 90%, 81%, 76%, and 69%, respectively. Patency tended to last longer in the unilateral group, but the difference was not significant (p=0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Although bilateral Wallstent placement achieved equal technical and clinical success, it tended to confer shorter-lived patency and caused more complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14533962     DOI: 10.1177/152660280301000416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  14 in total

1.  Endovascular stent-based revascularization of malignant superior vena cava syndrome with concomitant implantation of a port device using a dual venous approach.

Authors:  Susanne Anton; T Oechtering; E Stahlberg; F Jacob; M Kleemann; J Barkhausen; J P Goltz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Endoluminal treatment for venous vascular complications of malignant tumors.

Authors:  Liang Xiao; Jia-Jie Tong; Jing Shen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Superior Vena Cava Rupture and Cardiac Tamponade Complicating the Endovascular Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  David C Stevens; Sabah Butty; Matthew S Johnson
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Etiologies, Manifestations, and Treatments.

Authors:  Keith B Quencer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

5.  Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Wallstent: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ali Kordzadeh; Alan Askari; Muhammad A Hanif; Vijay Gadhvi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2022-06-25

6.  Covered stent placement for the treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome: is unilateral covered stenting safe and effective?

Authors:  Younghoon Cho; Dong Il Gwon; Gi-Young Ko; Heung Kyu Ko; Jin Hyoung Kim; Ji Hoon Shin; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Kyu-Bo Sung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Percutaneous stenting of bilateral central venous occlusions in a hemodialysis patient.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Murasato; Takuo Tsurugi; Kinya Hiroshige; Fumihiko Kamezaki; Hiroshi Suzuka; Kiyoshi Kawanami; Yoshiyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Malignant Venous Obstruction: Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Beyond.

Authors:  Tamir Friedman; Keith B Quencer; Sirish A Kishore; Ronald S Winokur; David C Madoff
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Superior Vena Cava (SVC) Endovascular Reconstruction with Implanted Central Venous Catheter Repositioning for Treatment of Malignant SVC Obstruction.

Authors:  Stephanie Volpi; Francesco Doenz; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-01-26

10.  Superior vena cava syndrome: endovascular management.

Authors:  Walter Kegham Karakhanian; Walter Zavem Karakhanian; Sergio Quilici Belczak
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2019-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.