Literature DB >> 14533214

Oral care of the critically ill: a review of the literature and guidelines for practice.

Marianne O'Reilly1.   

Abstract

Maintaining oral health in the critically ill patient is imperative in reducing the risk of nosocomial infections and improving patient comfort and discharge outcomes. Critically ill patients are at great risk for poor oral health as many are elderly, undernourished, dehydrated, immunosuppressed, have a smoking or alcohol history, are intubated or on high-flow oxygen, and are unable to mechanically remove dental plaque. Many modalities for delivering oral care have been reported in the literature. The use of the toothbrush in the mechanical removal of plaque, even in the intubated patient, has been proven to be superior to the swab. Brushing of the gums in edentulous patients is of benefit. Although electric toothbrushes are preferable, their cost, size and the potential for cross-infection limits their use. Chlorhexidine has long been the gold standard for mouthwashes and provides up to 24 hours of antimicrobial activity; therefore infrequent applications are adequate. Sodium bicarbonate and hydrogen peroxide are of limited use due to lack of convincing evidence regarding their safety and antimicrobial effects in the critically ill population. Saliva stimulants or substitutes including lemon and glycerine are also inappropriate for moistening the oral cavity in the critically ill patient. Regular oral assessment and individualized oral care, along with the use of a standardised protocol for oral care (incorporating proven modalities) is vital for optimal oral care in the critically ill patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14533214     DOI: 10.1016/s1036-7314(03)80007-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Crit Care        ISSN: 1036-7314            Impact factor:   2.737


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evidence to support tooth brushing in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Nancy J Ames
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Effectiveness of supervised implementation of an oral health care guideline in care homes; a single-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gert-Jan van der Putten; Jan Mulder; Cees de Baat; Luc M J De Visschere; Jacques N O Vanobbergen; Jos M G A Schols
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Oral care may reduce pneumonia in the tube-fed elderly: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Keisuke Maeda; Junji Akagi
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Supervised versus non-supervised implementation of an oral health care guideline in (residential) care homes: a cluster randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Gert-Jan van der Putten; Luc De Visschere; Jos Schols; Cees de Baat; Jacques Vanobbergen
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Effect of daily application of a 0.05% chlorhexidine solution on the incidence of (aspiration) pneumonia in care home residents: design of a multicentre cluster randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Vanessa Hollaar; Claar van der Maarel-Wierink; Gert-Jan van der Putten; Bert de Swart; Cees de Baat
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Exploring the Nursing Factors Related to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Yanling Yin; Meirong Sun; Zhe Li; Jingjing Bu; Yuhong Chen; Kun Zhang; Zhenjie Hu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-06

7.  Ions release evaluation and corrosion of titanium mini-implant surface in response to orthokin, oral B and chlorhexidine mouthwashes.

Authors:  Shiva Alavi; Atefe Ahmadvand
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-05-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.