OBJECTIVES: to investigate whether appropriate selection in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management (TEAM) or open graft replacement (OGR) may decrease in-hospital mortality rates (MR). DESIGN: analysis of a clinical series over three periods in an university vascular center. Conclusions of the second period were drawn and prospectively applied in a third period and compared. METHODS: during the period 1989-1994 only OGR was available (n=170). In the interval 1995-2000 either OGR or TEAM were carried out (n=454). During the period 01/2001-07/2002 the conclusions concerning selection of treatment modality were drawn and prospectively applied in 132 consecutive patients. MR were recorded and possible significant differences were checked. RESULTS: during the first period MR was 6.5%. Overall MR decreased to 3.7% in the second interval. Overall MR of the last period was improved to 1.5% (p<0.05). No patient died after OGR (0% vs 6.5%, p<0.04). As all patients with significant individual risk profiles were treated by TEAM, MR slightly increased (2.9%), but the difference remained insignificant (2.4% in period 2). CONCLUSIONS: risk adjusted selection of treatment modality influences the results after OGR significantly, thereby reducing overall MR of elective AAA treatment.
OBJECTIVES: to investigate whether appropriate selection in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management (TEAM) or open graft replacement (OGR) may decrease in-hospital mortality rates (MR). DESIGN: analysis of a clinical series over three periods in an university vascular center. Conclusions of the second period were drawn and prospectively applied in a third period and compared. METHODS: during the period 1989-1994 only OGR was available (n=170). In the interval 1995-2000 either OGR or TEAM were carried out (n=454). During the period 01/2001-07/2002 the conclusions concerning selection of treatment modality were drawn and prospectively applied in 132 consecutive patients. MR were recorded and possible significant differences were checked. RESULTS: during the first period MR was 6.5%. Overall MR decreased to 3.7% in the second interval. Overall MR of the last period was improved to 1.5% (p<0.05). No patient died after OGR (0% vs 6.5%, p<0.04). As all patients with significant individual risk profiles were treated by TEAM, MR slightly increased (2.9%), but the difference remained insignificant (2.4% in period 2). CONCLUSIONS: risk adjusted selection of treatment modality influences the results after OGR significantly, thereby reducing overall MR of elective AAA treatment.
Authors: Harald Teufelsbauer; Alexander M Prusa; Klaus Wolff; Mariana Sahal; Thomas Hölzenbein; Georg Kretschmer; Ihor Huk; Peter Polterauer Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 1.704