Literature DB >> 14532333

Microarray experimental design: power and sample size considerations.

M C K Yang1, J J Yang, R A McIndoe, J X She.   

Abstract

Gene expression analysis using high-throughput microarray technology has become a powerful approach to study systems biology. The exponential growth in microarray experiments has spawned a number of investigations into the reliability and reproducibility of this type of data. However, the sample size requirements necessary to obtain statistically significant results has not had as much attention. We report here statistical methods for the determination of the sufficient number of subjects necessary to minimize the false discovery rate while maintaining high power to detect differentially expressed genes. Two experimental designs were considered: 1) a comparison between two groups at a single time point, and 2) a comparison of two experimental groups with sequential time points. Computer programs are available for the methods discussed in this paper and are adaptable to more complicated situations.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14532333     DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00037.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Genomics        ISSN: 1094-8341            Impact factor:   3.107


  13 in total

1.  Practical guidelines for assessing power and false discovery rate for a fixed sample size in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Tiejun Tong; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Application of pharmacological approaches to plant-mammal interactions.

Authors:  Jennifer S Sorensen; Michele M Skopec; M Denise Dearing
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics.

Authors:  Damien Chaussabel; Virginia Pascual; Jacques Banchereau
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Analyzing microarray data with transitive directed acyclic graphs.

Authors:  Vinhthuy Phan; E Olusegun George; Quynh T Tran; Shirlean Goodwin; Sridevi Bodreddigari; Thomas R Sutter
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.122

5.  Why is there a lack of consensus on molecular subgroups of glioblastoma? Understanding the nature of biological and statistical variability in glioblastoma expression data.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko; John Quackenbush; Robert J Weil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Clinical review: sepsis and septic shock--the potential of gene arrays.

Authors:  Hector R Wong
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  An improved procedure for gene selection from microarray experiments using false discovery rate criterion.

Authors:  James J Yang; Mark C K Yang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Per Broberg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Power and sample size estimation in microarray studies.

Authors:  Wei-Jiun Lin; Huey-Miin Hsueh; James J Chen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Dose-dependent effects of calorie restriction on gene expression, metabolism, and tumor progression are partially mediated by insulin-like growth factor-1.

Authors:  Leticia M Nogueira; Jackie A Lavigne; Gadisetti V R Chandramouli; Huaitian Lui; J Carl Barrett; Stephen D Hursting
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.