Literature DB >> 1453205

Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new prodrug N-l-leucyldoxorubicin and its metabolites in a phase I clinical trial.

J de Jong1, G J Geijssen, C N Munniksma, J B Vermorken, W J van der Vijgh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: N-l-leucyldoxorubicin (Leu-Dox) was developed as a prodrug of doxorubicin (Dox) to circumvent the cardiotoxicity associated with repeated administration of Dox. Our purpose was to assess the pharmacokinetics of Leu-Dox, Dox, doxorubicinol (Dol) and four other metabolites for pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation and to verify the prodrug character of Leu-Dox. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood and urine of 14 patients were sampled during the phase I clinical trial and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Dose levels of Leu-Dox ranged from 18 mg/m2 to 225 mg/m2, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Hematologic parameters were monitored regularly in each patient.
RESULTS: Leu-Dox was rapidly distributed (half-life at alpha phase [t1/2 alpha] = 2.5 +/- 0.6 minutes) followed by a biphasic elimination (half-life at beta phase [t1/2 beta] = 17.4 +/- 7.3 minutes; half-life at gamma phase [t1/2 gamma] = 1.5 +/- 0.5 hours), as measured over the first 12 hours after administration. In three patients, in whom Leu-Dox was found in the plasma for up to 48 hours after injection, a final elimination half-life (t1/2,elim) of 16 hours was observed. The t1/2,elim of Leu-Dox was short (0.6 to 16.5 hours) compared with the t1/2,elim of Dox (38 +/- 11 hours). The mean residence time and apparent volume of distribution were 23 +/- 5 minutes and 19 +/- 6 L/m2, respectively. Only 1.5% to 5% of the dose was excreted in the urine over 48 hours, with Dox as major constituent. Dox was rapidly formed, reaching its maximum concentration within 10 minutes after the end of Leu-Dox infusion. Areas under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC infinity, mean +/- SD, n = 16) of Leu-Dox, Dox, and Dol were 115 +/- 27 mumol.min/L, 41 +/- 12 mumol.min/L, and 33 +/- 14 mumol.min/L after a dose of 60 mg/m2 Leu-Dox (= 86 mumol/m2). After the same molar dose of Dox (50 mg/m2 = 86 mumol/m2), the AUC infinity of Dox was 179 mumol.min/L, indicating that Leu-Dox was converted into Dox for 23% in the plasma compartment. The AUCs infinity of Leu-Dox, Dox, and Dol increased linearly with the dose. Negligible AUCs were observed for the other four metabolites. The AUCs infinity of Leu-Dox and Dox at the MTD (517 and 145 mumol.min/L, respectively) were lower than those in mice at the LD10 (1,930 and 798 mumol.min/L, respectively), which means that the MTD could not be predicted from the preclinical pharmacokinetics in mice. Hematologic toxicity, especially the WBC count, appeared to correlate much better with the AUC of Dox (r = .91) than with the AUC of Leu-Dox (r = .74), thus confirming the prodrug character of Leu-Dox.
CONCLUSIONS: Dox is rapidly formed from Leu-Dox, and seems causative in the observed myelotoxicity. The MTD could not be predicted from the AUC at the LD10 in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1453205     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  Secondary alcohol metabolites mediate iron delocalization in cytosolic fractions of myocardial biopsies exposed to anticancer anthracyclines. Novel linkage between anthracycline metabolism and iron-induced cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  G Minotti; A F Cavaliere; A Mordente; M Rossi; R Schiavello; R Zamparelli; G Possati
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of the anthracycline anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Romano Danesi; Stefano Fogli; Alessandra Gennari; Pierfranco Conte; Mario Del Tacca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Analysis and pharmacokinetics of N-l-leucyldoxorubucin and metabolites in tissues of tumor-bearing BALB/c mice.

Authors:  J de Jong; I Klein; A Bast; W J van der Vijgh
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Anthracycline antibiotics in cancer therapy. Focus on drug resistance.

Authors:  D J Booser; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Lack of in vitro interactions using human liver microsomes between rabeprazole and anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Ilaria Tamaro; Armando Genazzani; Pierluigi Canonico; Giorgio Grosa
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

6.  A novel doxorubicin-glucuronide prodrug DOX-GA3 for tumour-selective chemotherapy: distribution and efficacy in experimental human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  P H Houba; E Boven; I H van der Meulen-Muileman; R G Leenders; J W Scheeren; H M Pinedo; H J Haisma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.