BACKGROUND: The importation of SARS was responsible for the outbreaks in Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam and Canada at a time when this new disease had not been identified. We report the incidence and impact of cases of SARS imported to Singapore between 25 February and 31 May 2003, and describe national measures to prevent further importation. METHODS: Information on imported cases of SARS and measures taken at entry points to Singapore was retrieved from the Ministry of Health and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore. RESULTS: Of the 6 imported cases, which all occurred before screening measures were implemented at the airport, only the first resulted in extensive secondary transmission. Of 442973 air passengers screened after measures were implemented, 136 were sent to a designated hospital for further SARS screening; none was diagnosed as having SARS. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS outbreak in Singapore can be traced to the first imported case. The absence of transmission from the other imported cases was probably a result of relatively prompt identification and isolation of cases, together with a low potential for transmission. New imported SARS cases therefore need not lead to major outbreaks if systems are in place to identify and isolate them early. Screening at entry points is costly, has a low yield and is not sufficient in itself, but may be justified in light of the major economic, social and international impact which even a single imported SARS case may have.
BACKGROUND: The importation of SARS was responsible for the outbreaks in Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam and Canada at a time when this new disease had not been identified. We report the incidence and impact of cases of SARS imported to Singapore between 25 February and 31 May 2003, and describe national measures to prevent further importation. METHODS: Information on imported cases of SARS and measures taken at entry points to Singapore was retrieved from the Ministry of Health and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore. RESULTS: Of the 6 imported cases, which all occurred before screening measures were implemented at the airport, only the first resulted in extensive secondary transmission. Of 442973 air passengers screened after measures were implemented, 136 were sent to a designated hospital for further SARS screening; none was diagnosed as having SARS. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS outbreak in Singapore can be traced to the first imported case. The absence of transmission from the other imported cases was probably a result of relatively prompt identification and isolation of cases, together with a low potential for transmission. New imported SARS cases therefore need not lead to major outbreaks if systems are in place to identify and isolate them early. Screening at entry points is costly, has a low yield and is not sufficient in itself, but may be justified in light of the major economic, social and international impact which even a single imported SARS case may have.
Authors: Marc Lipsitch; Ted Cohen; Ben Cooper; James M Robins; Stefan Ma; Lyn James; Gowri Gopalakrishna; Suok Kai Chew; Chorh Chuan Tan; Matthew H Samore; David Fisman; Megan Murray Journal: Science Date: 2003-05-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Steven Riley; Christophe Fraser; Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Laith J Abu-Raddad; Anthony J Hedley; Gabriel M Leung; Lai-Ming Ho; Tai-Hing Lam; Thuan Q Thach; Patsy Chau; King-Pan Chan; Su-Vui Lo; Pak-Yin Leung; Thomas Tsang; William Ho; Koon-Hung Lee; Edith M C Lau; Neil M Ferguson; Roy M Anderson Journal: Science Date: 2003-05-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Nelson Lee; David Hui; Alan Wu; Paul Chan; Peter Cameron; Gavin M Joynt; Anil Ahuja; Man Yee Yung; C B Leung; K F To; S F Lui; C C Szeto; Sydney Chung; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan M Poutanen; Donald E Low; Bonnie Henry; Sandy Finkelstein; David Rose; Karen Green; Raymond Tellier; Ryan Draker; Dena Adachi; Melissa Ayers; Adrienne K Chan; Danuta M Skowronski; Irving Salit; Andrew E Simor; Arthur S Slutsky; Patrick W Doyle; Mel Krajden; Martin Petric; Robert C Brunham; Allison J McGeer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Li-Yang Hsu; Cheng-Chuan Lee; Justin A Green; Brenda Ang; Nicholas I Paton; Lawrence Lee; Jorge S Villacian; Poh-Lian Lim; Arul Earnest; Yee-Sin Leo Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Varvara A Mouchtouri; Eleni P Christoforidou; Maria An der Heiden; Cinthia Menel Lemos; Margherita Fanos; Ute Rexroth; Ulrike Grote; Evelien Belfroid; Corien Swaan; Christos Hadjichristodoulou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Archie C A Clements; Ricardo J Soares Magalhães; Andrew J Tatem; David L Paterson; Thomas V Riley Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Li-Qun Fang; Sake J de Vlas; Dan Feng; Song Liang; You-Fu Xu; Jie-Ping Zhou; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Wu-Chun Cao Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 2.622