Literature DB >> 14531891

Innate immunity and biodefence vaccines.

Nicholas M Valiante1, Derek T O'Hagan, Jeffrey B Ulmer.   

Abstract

Host defence in vertebrates is achieved by the integration of two distinct arms of the immune system: the innate and adaptive responses. The innate response acts early after infection (within minutes), detecting and responding to broad cues from invading pathogens. The adaptive response takes time (days to weeks) to become effective, but provides the fine antigenic specificity required for complete elimination of the pathogen and the generation of immunologic memory. Antigen-independent recognition of pathogens by the innate immune system leads to the rapid mobilization of immune effector and regulatory mechanisms that provide the host with three critical advantages: (i) initiating the immune response (both innate and adaptive) and providing the inflammatory and co-stimulatory context for antigen recognition; (ii) mounting a first line of defence, thereby holding the pathogen in check during the maturation of the adaptive response; and (iii) steering the adaptive immune system towards the cellular or humoral responses most effective against the particular infectious agent. The quest for safer and more effective vaccines and immune-based therapies has taken on a sudden urgency with the increased threat of bioterrorism. Only a handful of vaccines covering a small proportion of potential biowarfare agents are available for human use (e.g. anthrax and small pox) and these suffer from poor safety profiles. Therefore, next generation biodefence-related vaccines and therapies with improved safety and the capacity to induce more rapid, more potent and broader protection are needed. To this end, strategies to target both the innate and adaptive immune systems will be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14531891     DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00318.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-5814            Impact factor:   3.715


  6 in total

1.  CpG oligodeoxynucleotides adsorbed onto polylactide-co-glycolide microparticles improve the immunogenicity and protective activity of the licensed anthrax vaccine.

Authors:  Hang Xie; Ihsan Gursel; Bruce E Ivins; Manmohan Singh; Derek T O'Hagan; Jeffrey B Ulmer; Dennis M Klinman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  The proinflammatory response induced by wild-type Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection inhibits survival of yop mutants in the gastrointestinal tract and Peyer's patches.

Authors:  Lauren K Logsdon; Joan Mecsas
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Resistance to Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice treated with silk protein by enhanced immune responses.

Authors:  Joung-Ho Moon; Kyoung-Ho Pyo; Bong-Kwang Jung; Hyang Sook Chun; Jong-Yil Chai; Eun-Hee Shin
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 1.341

4.  Enhanced Immune Response to DNA Vaccine Encoding Bacillus anthracis PA-D4 Protects Mice against Anthrax Spore Challenge.

Authors:  Na Young Kim; Dong Suk Chang; Yeonsu Kim; Chang Hwan Kim; Gyeung Haeng Hur; Jai Myung Yang; Sungho Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Novel approaches to vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Derek T O'Hagan; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Higher Cytokine and Opsonizing Antibody Production Induced by Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)-Conjugated Tetrasaccharide Related to Streptococcus pneumoniae Type 3 Capsular Polysaccharide.

Authors:  Ekaterina A Kurbatova; Nelli K Akhmatova; Anton E Zaytsev; Elina A Akhmatova; Nadezhda B Egorova; Natalya E Yastrebova; Elena V Sukhova; Dmitriy V Yashunsky; Yury E Tsvetkov; Nikolay E Nifantiev
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 7.561

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.