R J L F Loffeld1, A B M M van der Putten. 1. Dept. of Internal Medicine, de Heel Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, The Netherlands. r.loffeld@chello.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few data on the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in different populations and no data on changes in time. A cross-sectional study was done in a large population of patients undergoing endoscopy in order to relate the presence of H. pylori to ethnic background and to detect changes in time. METHODS: All consecutive patients over a 10-year period were included and biopsy specimens from the gastric antrum were taken for detection of H. pylori. A large population of immigrants living in the Zaanstreek region was studied separately. RESULTS: In the 10-year period, 14,909 consecutive diagnostic upper GI endoscopies were done in 11,691 consecutive patients. Only the first endoscopy done in a patient was included. Of 11,691 patients available for evaluation, there were 5669 men and 6022 women (mean age 55 years, range 4-99). Of these, 3201 (27.4%) were H. pylori-positive and 4988 (42.7%) were H. pylori-negative. No biopsy specimens were available for the remaining 3501 (29.9%) patients. In the group under study, 1309 (11%) patients were immigrants. H. pylori was present significantly more often in men and in immigrants, where prevalence was 75% versus 33% (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of H. pylori showed a marked decrease in both populations during the period of study. Extrapolating trend lines into the future indicates a prevalence of H. pylori below 10% by the year 2009. Among immigrants, this will be reached in approximately 2027. CONCLUSION: This study shows differences in prevalence of H. pylori in different populations. We found a decreasing prevalence that can be explained by the lower acquisition rate of the infection. It is important to be aware of the differences in prevalence of H. pylori in a population composed of different ethnicities.
BACKGROUND: There are few data on the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in different populations and no data on changes in time. A cross-sectional study was done in a large population of patients undergoing endoscopy in order to relate the presence of H. pylori to ethnic background and to detect changes in time. METHODS: All consecutive patients over a 10-year period were included and biopsy specimens from the gastric antrum were taken for detection of H. pylori. A large population of immigrants living in the Zaanstreek region was studied separately. RESULTS: In the 10-year period, 14,909 consecutive diagnostic upper GI endoscopies were done in 11,691 consecutive patients. Only the first endoscopy done in a patient was included. Of 11,691 patients available for evaluation, there were 5669 men and 6022 women (mean age 55 years, range 4-99). Of these, 3201 (27.4%) were H. pylori-positive and 4988 (42.7%) were H. pylori-negative. No biopsy specimens were available for the remaining 3501 (29.9%) patients. In the group under study, 1309 (11%) patients were immigrants. H. pylori was present significantly more often in men and in immigrants, where prevalence was 75% versus 33% (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of H. pylori showed a marked decrease in both populations during the period of study. Extrapolating trend lines into the future indicates a prevalence of H. pylori below 10% by the year 2009. Among immigrants, this will be reached in approximately 2027. CONCLUSION: This study shows differences in prevalence of H. pylori in different populations. We found a decreasing prevalence that can be explained by the lower acquisition rate of the infection. It is important to be aware of the differences in prevalence of H. pylori in a population composed of different ethnicities.
Authors: Wouter J den Hollander; I Lisanne Holster; Caroline M den Hoed; Frances van Deurzen; Anneke J van Vuuren; Vincent W Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Guillermo I Perez Perez; Martin J Blaser; Henriëtte A Moll; Ernst J Kuipers Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Guillermo Ignacio Perez-Perez; Asalia Zuni Olivares; F Yeong Foo; Sun Foo; Andre J Neusy; Christopher Ng; Robert S Holzman; Michael Marmor; Martin J Blaser Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2005-07-20 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Hyasinta Jaka; Martha F Mushi; Mariam M Mirambo; Leonard Wilson; Jeremiah Seni; Majigo Mtebe; Stephen E Mshana Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: A C de Vries; G A Meijer; C W N Looman; M K Casparie; B E Hansen; N C T van Grieken; E J Kuipers Journal: Gut Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 23.059