Literature DB >> 14530843

Reproducibility of grading scales of pelvic muscle strength: standard versus tampon scale.

Catherine M Lynch1, Christine Kneer Aronoff.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the reproducibility of an objective scale utilizing a tampon to assess pelvic muscle strength and to compare it to a digital evaluation of muscle strength [1]. Thirty women presenting to the office were enrolled in the study. Their pelvic floor muscle strength was separately assessed by both examiners using both scales. The reproducibility of the scales was then analyzed by Cohen's kappa measure of interrater agreement. The tampon scale was found to have a measure of agreement of 0.76 (excellent interrater agreement if >0.75). In contrast, the digital scale was found to have a measure of agreement of 0.68 (fair agreement if 0.40-0.75). Therefore, the tampon scale is an easy and reproducible approach for assessing pelvic floor muscle strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530843     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-003-1055-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  2 in total

1.  Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles.

Authors:  A H KEGEL
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1948-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The circumvaginal musculature: correlation between pressure and physical assessment.

Authors:  P L McKey; M C Dougherty
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Pelvic floor muscle evaluation in incontinent patients.

Authors:  João Luiz Amaro; Eliane Cristina Hilberath Moreira; Mônica De Oliveira Orsi Gameiro; Carlos Roberto Padovani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-01-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.