OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to perform kidney transplantation under a regimen of immunosuppression that facilitates rather than interferes with the recently defined mechanisms of alloengraftment and acquired tolerance. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In almost all centers, multiple immunosuppressive agents are given in large doses after kidney transplantation in an attempt to reduce the incidence of acute rejection to near zero. With the elucidation of the mechanisms of alloengraftment and acquired tolerance, it was realized that such heavy prophylactic immunosuppression could systematically subvert the clonal exhaustion-deletion that is the seminal mechanism of tolerance. In addition, it has been established that the rejection response can be made more readily treatable by pretransplant immunosuppression. Consequently, we conducted kidney transplantation in compliance with 2 therapeutic principles: recipient pretreatment and the least possible use of posttransplant immunosuppression. METHODS: One-hundred fifty unselected renal transplant recipients with a mean age of 51 +/- 15 years and multiple risk factors had pretreatment with approximately 5 mg/kg of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) in the hours before transplantation, under covering bolus doses of prednisone to prevent cytokine reactions. Minimal posttransplant immunosuppression was with tacrolimus monotherapy to which steroids or other agents were added only for the treatment of rejection. At or after 4 months after transplant, spaced-dose weaning from tacrolimus monotherapy was begun in patients who had exhibited a satisfactory course. RESULTS: One-year actuarial patient and graft survival was 97% and 92%, respectively. Although the incidence of early acute rejection was 37%, only 7% required prolonged treatment with any agent other than tacrolimus. After a follow-up of 6 to 21 months, the mean serum creatinine in patients with functioning grafts is 1.8 +/- 1.0 mg/dL. Seventy-three percent of the patients met the criteria for spaced weaning. Although rejection episodes occasionally required restoration of daily treatment, 94 (63%) of the 150 patients currently receive tacrolimus in spaced doses ranging from every other day to once a week. CONCLUSIONS: With this approach to immunosuppression, it has been possible to avoid early posttransplant overimmunosuppression and thereby to promote the evolution of a degree of partial tolerance sufficient to undertake substantial dose reduction. The strategy, which is applicable for all organ grafts, constitutes a paradigm shift in transplant management at our center.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to perform kidney transplantation under a regimen of immunosuppression that facilitates rather than interferes with the recently defined mechanisms of alloengraftment and acquired tolerance. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In almost all centers, multiple immunosuppressive agents are given in large doses after kidney transplantation in an attempt to reduce the incidence of acute rejection to near zero. With the elucidation of the mechanisms of alloengraftment and acquired tolerance, it was realized that such heavy prophylactic immunosuppression could systematically subvert the clonal exhaustion-deletion that is the seminal mechanism of tolerance. In addition, it has been established that the rejection response can be made more readily treatable by pretransplant immunosuppression. Consequently, we conducted kidney transplantation in compliance with 2 therapeutic principles: recipient pretreatment and the least possible use of posttransplant immunosuppression. METHODS: One-hundred fifty unselected renal transplant recipients with a mean age of 51 +/- 15 years and multiple risk factors had pretreatment with approximately 5 mg/kg of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) in the hours before transplantation, under covering bolus doses of prednisone to prevent cytokine reactions. Minimal posttransplant immunosuppression was with tacrolimus monotherapy to which steroids or other agents were added only for the treatment of rejection. At or after 4 months after transplant, spaced-dose weaning from tacrolimus monotherapy was begun in patients who had exhibited a satisfactory course. RESULTS: One-year actuarial patient and graft survival was 97% and 92%, respectively. Although the incidence of early acute rejection was 37%, only 7% required prolonged treatment with any agent other than tacrolimus. After a follow-up of 6 to 21 months, the mean serum creatinine in patients with functioning grafts is 1.8 +/- 1.0 mg/dL. Seventy-three percent of the patients met the criteria for spaced weaning. Although rejection episodes occasionally required restoration of daily treatment, 94 (63%) of the 150 patients currently receive tacrolimus in spaced doses ranging from every other day to once a week. CONCLUSIONS: With this approach to immunosuppression, it has been possible to avoid early posttransplant overimmunosuppression and thereby to promote the evolution of a degree of partial tolerance sufficient to undertake substantial dose reduction. The strategy, which is applicable for all organ grafts, constitutes a paradigm shift in transplant management at our center.
Authors: S John Swanson; Douglas A Hale; Roslyn B Mannon; David E Kleiner; Linda C Cendales; Christine E Chamberlain; Shirley M Polly; David M Harlan; Allan D Kirk Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-11-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas E Starzl; Noriko Murase; Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Edward A Gray; Ron Shapiro; Bijan Eghtesad; Robert J Corry; Mark L Jordan; Paulo Fontes; Tim Gayowski; Geoffrey Bond; Velma P Scantlebury; Santosh Potdar; Parmjeet Randhawa; Tong Wu; Adriana Zeevi; Michael A Nalesnik; Jennifer Woodward; Amadeo Marcos; Massimo Trucco; Anthony J Demetris; John J Fung Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: T E Starzl; A J Demetris; M Trucco; N Murase; C Ricordi; S Ildstad; H Ramos; S Todo; A Tzakis; J J Fung Journal: Hepatology Date: 1993-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Stuart J Knechtle; John D Pirsch; John H Fechner; Bryan N Becker; Andreas Friedl; Robert B Colvin; Lauralynn K Lebeck; L Thomas Chin; Yolanda T Becker; Jon S Odorico; Anthony M D'Alessandro; Munci Kalayoglu; Majed M Hamawy; Huaizhong Hu; Debra D Bloom; Hans W Sollinger Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: P Fontes; A S Rao; A J Demetris; A Zeevi; M Trucco; P Carroll; W Rybka; W A Rudert; C Ricordi; F Dodson Journal: Lancet Date: 1994-07-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Basu; J L Falcone; H P Tan; D Hassan; I Dvorchik; K Bahri; N Thai; P S Randhawa; A Marcos; T E Starzl; R Shapiro Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Amadeo Marcos; Bijan Eghtesad; John J Fung; Paulo Fontes; Kusum Patel; Michael Devera; Wallis Marsh; Timothy Gayowski; Anthony J Demetris; Edward A Gray; Bridget Flynn; Adriana Zeevi; Noriko Murase; Thomas E Starzl Journal: Transplantation Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Nizar Younas; Christine M Wu; Ron Shapiro; Jerry McCauley; James Johnston; Henkie Tan; Amit Basu; Heidi Schaefer; Cynthia Smetanka; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Mark Unruh Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 2.388