PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to discuss indications, technical approach, and morbidity of laparoscopic approaches to major bowel resection in the pediatric/adolescent population with inflammatory bowel disease and familial polyposis. METHODS: Retrospective review of laparoscopic-assisted bowel procedures between May 1991 and January 2002 was performed. Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection is defined as complete intracorporeal mobilization and devascularization of a segment of colon or rectum. The indications for extracorporeal vs. intracorporeal anastomosis will be discussed. Clinically unstable, septic, or massively bleeding patients were not candidates for this technique. The decision to attempt the laparoscopic approach was based on the experience of the consulting surgeon. There were 31 patients, including 14 females. Five patients had undergone prior surgery. Twenty-nine patients had inflammatory bowel disease, one had familial polyposis, and one had a cavernous hemangioma. We included all pediatric/adolescent patients in our practice undergoing laparoscopic resection. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had 33 laparoscopic operations, including proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 14), proctocolectomy with ileostomy (n = 3), ileocolectomy with ileocolic anastomosis (n = 13), and small-bowel obstruction (n = 1). Average operating time was 158 (range, 30-400) minutes, with average blood loss of 159 ml. Average wound length was 4.9 cm. The complication rate was 16 percent (n = 5), with one anastomotic leak. The rate of conversion to open operations was 5.8 percent. Liquid diet was begun on Day 3, and the average length of stay was 5.9 days. CONCLUSION: Major laparoscopic bowel surgery can be performed safely in the pediatric/adolescent population, with reasonable operative times, low conversion to open operations, and low morbidity.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to discuss indications, technical approach, and morbidity of laparoscopic approaches to major bowel resection in the pediatric/adolescent population with inflammatory bowel disease and familial polyposis. METHODS: Retrospective review of laparoscopic-assisted bowel procedures between May 1991 and January 2002 was performed. Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection is defined as complete intracorporeal mobilization and devascularization of a segment of colon or rectum. The indications for extracorporeal vs. intracorporeal anastomosis will be discussed. Clinically unstable, septic, or massively bleedingpatients were not candidates for this technique. The decision to attempt the laparoscopic approach was based on the experience of the consulting surgeon. There were 31 patients, including 14 females. Five patients had undergone prior surgery. Twenty-nine patients had inflammatory bowel disease, one had familial polyposis, and one had a cavernous hemangioma. We included all pediatric/adolescent patients in our practice undergoing laparoscopic resection. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had 33 laparoscopic operations, including proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 14), proctocolectomy with ileostomy (n = 3), ileocolectomy with ileocolic anastomosis (n = 13), and small-bowel obstruction (n = 1). Average operating time was 158 (range, 30-400) minutes, with average blood loss of 159 ml. Average wound length was 4.9 cm. The complication rate was 16 percent (n = 5), with one anastomotic leak. The rate of conversion to open operations was 5.8 percent. Liquid diet was begun on Day 3, and the average length of stay was 5.9 days. CONCLUSION: Major laparoscopic bowel surgery can be performed safely in the pediatric/adolescent population, with reasonable operative times, low conversion to open operations, and low morbidity.
Authors: Edward D Courtney; Mary Brennan; Gabriele Noble-Jamieson; Rob Heuschkel; R Justin Davies Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: G Pellino; D S Keller; G M Sampietro; V Annese; M Carvello; V Celentano; C Coco; F Colombo; N Cracco; F Di Candido; M Franceschi; S Laureti; G Mattioli; L Pio; G Sciaudone; G Sica; V Villanacci; R Zinicola; S Leone; S Danese; A Spinelli; G Delaini; F Selvaggi Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-01-25 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: R F Leal; M de Lourdes Setsuko Ayrizono; P V Villalobos Tapia Silva; P de Sene Portel Oliveira; J J Fagundes; C S Rodrigues Coy Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 3.781