Literature DB >> 14530612

Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort study.

N van Gemund1, A Hardeman, S A Scherjon, H H H Kanhai.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Elective induction of labor has become a widely used procedure in obstetrics. A number of studies have shown an increased incidence of operative deliveries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of interventions in our hospital, including operative delivery.
METHODS: A matched cohort study in which labor of 122 electively induced women and 122 women with labor with a spontaneous onset were analyzed retrospectively. These women were matched for parity and gestational age.
RESULTS: Pain relief, fetal scalp blood sampling and operative deliveries were recorded more frequently in the electively induced labor group. Cesarean delivery was found in 15% of women with induced labor, and in 1% of labors with a spontaneous onset (relative risk 18 (95% CI 2.4-132.7)). No differences were found in neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Elective induction of labor leads to increased intervention rates during labor. The rate of cesarean delivery is high, particular in nulliparous women and multiparous women without a previous vaginal birth. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530612     DOI: 10.1159/000073771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  9 in total

1.  Elective induction versus spontaneous labour in Latin America.

Authors:  Gláucia Virgínia Guerra; José Guilherme Cecatti; João Paulo Souza; Aníbal Faúndes; Sirlei Siani Morais; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Renato Passini; Mary Angela Parpinelli; Guillermo Carroli
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Induction of Labour in Late and Postterm Pregnancies and its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  F Thangarajah; P Scheufen; V Kirn; P Mallmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Grecio Sandoval; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Robert M Silver; Gail Mallett; Kim Hill; Madeline Murguia Rice; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Jay D Iams; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Reducing Length of Labor and Cesarean Surgery Rate Using a Peanut Ball for Women Laboring With an Epidural.

Authors:  Christina Marie Tussey; Emily Botsios; Richard D Gerkin; Lesly A Kelly; Juana Gamez; Jennifer Mensik
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

5.  Labour and neonatal outcome in small for gestational age babies delivered beyond 36+0 weeks: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  K E Boers; J A M van der Post; Ben W J Mol; J M M van Lith; S A Scherjon
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2010-12-15

6.  Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).

Authors:  K E Boers; S M C Vijgen; D Bijlenga; J A M van der Post; D J Bekedam; A Kwee; P C M van der Salm; M G van Pampus; M E A Spaanderman; K de Boer; J J Duvekot; H A Bremer; T H M Hasaart; F M C Delemarre; K W M Bloemenkamp; C A van Meir; C Willekes; E J Wijnen; M Rijken; S le Cessie; F J M E Roumen; J G Thornton; J M M van Lith; B W J Mol; S A Scherjon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-12-21

7.  Delivery or expectant management for prevention of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  T P Bernardes; E F Zwertbroek; K Broekhuijsen; C Koopmans; K Boers; M Owens; J Thornton; M G van Pampus; S A Scherjon; K Wallace; J Langenveld; P P van den Berg; M T M Franssen; B W J Mol; H Groen
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Maternal and perinatal outcome of preeclampsia without severe feature among pregnant women managed at a tertiary referral hospital in urban Ethiopia.

Authors:  Lemi Belay Tolu; Endale Yigezu; Tadesse Urgie; Garumma Tolu Feyissa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial.

Authors:  Corine M Koopmans; Denise Bijlenga; Jan G Aarnoudse; Erik van Beek; Dick J Bekedam; Paul P van den Berg; Jan M Burggraaff; Erwin Birnie; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Addi P Drogtrop; Arie Franx; Christianne J M de Groot; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Anneke Kwee; Saskia le Cessie; Aren J van Loon; Ben W J Mol; Joris A M van der Post; Frans J M E Roumen; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Marc E A Spaanderman; Rob H Stigter; Christine Willekes; Maria G van Pampus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.