Literature DB >> 14530488

Dosimetric analysis of radioimmunotherapy with 186Re-labeled bivatuzumab in patients with head and neck cancer.

Ernst J Postema1, Pontus K E Börjesson, Wilhelmina C A M Buijs, Jan C Roos, Henri A M Marres, Otto C Boerman, Remco de Bree, Margreet Lang, Gerd Munzert, Guus A M S van Dongen, Wim J G Oyen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: From December 1999 until July 2001, a phase I dose escalation study was performed with (186)Re-labeled bivatuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against CD44v6, on patients with inoperable recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. The aim of the trial was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenously administered (186)Re-bivatuzumab and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of (186)Re-bivatuzumab. The data were also used for dosimetric analysis of the treated patients. Dosimetry is used to estimate the absorbed doses by nontarget organs, as well as by tumors. It can also help to explain toxicity that is observed and to predict organs at risk because of the therapy given.
METHODS: Whole-body scintigraphy was used to draw regions around sites or organs of interest. Residence times in these organs and sites were calculated and entered into the MIRDOSE3 program, to obtain absorbed doses in all target organs except for red marrow. The red marrow dose was calculated using a blood-derived method. Twenty-one studies on 18 patients, 5 female and 16 male, were used for dosimetry.
RESULTS: The mean red marrow doses were 0.49 +/- 0.03 mGy/MBq for men and 0.64 +/- 0.03 mGy/MBq for women. The normal organ with the highest absorbed dose appeared to be the kidney (mean dose, 1.61 +/- 0.75 mGy/MBq in men and 2.15 +/- 0.95 mGy/MBq in women; maximum kidney dose in all patients, 11 Gy), but the doses absorbed are not expected to lead to renal toxicity. Other organs with doses exceeding 0.5 mGy/MBq were the lungs, the spleen, the heart, the liver, the bones, and the testes. The doses delivered to the tumor, recalculated to the MTD level of 1.85 GBq/m(2), ranged from 3.8 to 76.4 Gy, with a median of 12.4 Gy. A good correlation was found between platelet and white blood cell counts and the administered amount of activity per kilogram of body weight (r = -0.79).
CONCLUSION: Dosimetric analysis of the data revealed that the range of doses to normal organs seems to be well within acceptable and safe limits. Tumor doses ranged from 4 to 76 Gy. Given the acceptable tumor doses, (186)Re-labeled bivatuzumab could be a good candidate for future adjuvant radioimmunotherapy in patients with minimal residual disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  12 in total

1.  Chemoradionuclide therapy with 186re-labeled liposomal doxorubicin: toxicity, dosimetry, and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Anuradha Soundararajan; Ande Bao; William T Phillips; Linda M McManus; Beth A Goins
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.099

2.  Software package for integrated data processing for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine (SPRIND).

Authors:  Eric Visser; Ernst Postema; Otto Boerman; Jeroen Visschers; Wim Oyen; Frans Corstens
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Improving external beam radiotherapy by combination with internal irradiation.

Authors:  A Dietrich; L Koi; K Zöphel; W Sihver; J Kotzerke; M Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  [Immunotherapy of head and neck cancer. Current developments].

Authors:  P J Schuler; T K Hoffmann; T C Gauler; C Bergmann; S Brandau; S Lang
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Effect of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta inhibition with STI571 on radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Janina Baranowska-Kortylewicz; Michio Abe; Kristian Pietras; Zbigniew P Kortylewicz; Takashi Kurizaki; Jessica Nearman; Janna Paulsson; R Lee Mosley; Charles A Enke; Arne Ostman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Liqun Yang; Pengfei Shi; Gaichao Zhao; Jie Xu; Wen Peng; Jiayi Zhang; Guanghui Zhang; Xiaowen Wang; Zhen Dong; Fei Chen; Hongjuan Cui
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-02-07

7.  Near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ with CD44v6-specific antibodies in mice: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Jeroen F Vermeulen; Aram S A van Brussel; Arthur Adams; Willem P Th M Mali; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Patrick W B Derksen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Phototheranostics of CD44-positive cell populations in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jiefu Jin; Balaji Krishnamachary; Yelena Mironchik; Hisataka Kobayashi; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  CD44v6-Targeted Imaging of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Antibody-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Diana Spiegelberg; Johan Nilvebrant
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  In vivo characterization of the novel CD44v6-targeting Fab fragment AbD15179 for molecular imaging of squamous cell carcinoma: a dual-isotope study.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Haylock; Diana Spiegelberg; Johan Nilvebrant; Karl Sandström; Marika Nestor
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.