Literature DB >> 14530438

Effects of genomic context and chromatin structure on transcription-coupled and global genomic repair in mammalian cells.

Zhaohui Feng1, Wenwei Hu, Lawrence A Chasin, Moon-shong Tang.   

Abstract

It has been long recognized that in mammalian cells, DNA damage is preferentially repaired in the transcribed strand of transcriptionally active genes. However, recently, we found that in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) are preferentially repaired in both the transcribed and the non-transcribed strand of exon 1 of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene. We mapped CPD repair at the nucleotide level in the transcriptionally active DHFR gene and the adjacent upstream OST gene, both of which have been translocated to two chromosomal positions that differ from their normal endogeneous positions. This allowed us to study the role of transcription, genomic context and chromatin structure on repair. We found that CPD repair in the transcribed strand is the same for endogenous and translocated DHFR genes, and the order of repair efficiency is exon 1 > exon 2 > exon 5. However, unlike the endogenous DHFR gene, efficient repair of CPDs in the non-transcribed strand of exon 1 is not observed in the translocated DHFR gene. CPDs are efficiently repaired in the transcribed strand in endogenous and translocated OST genes, which indicates that efficient repair in exon 1 of the non-transcribed strand of the endogenous DHFR gene is not due to the extension of transcription-coupled repair of the OST gene. Using micrococcal nuclease digestion, we probed the chromatin structure in the DHFR gene and found that chromatin structure in the exon 1 region of endogenous DHFR is much more open than at translocated loci. These results suggest that while transcription-coupled repair is transcription dependent, global genomic repair is greatly affected by chromatin structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530438      PMCID: PMC219485          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  52 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the rodent repairadox.

Authors:  P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Controlling the efficiency of excision repair.

Authors:  P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-02-25       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and bulky chemical DNA adducts are efficiently repaired in both strands of either a transcriptionally active or promoter-deleted APRT gene.

Authors:  Y Zheng; A Pao; G M Adair; M Tang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  DNA damage in the nucleosome core is refractory to repair by human excision nuclease.

Authors:  R Hara; J Mo; A Sancar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Nucleotide excision repair of the 5 S ribosomal RNA gene assembled into a nucleosome.

Authors:  X Liu; M J Smerdon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  UV-induced DNA damage, repair, mutations and oncogenic pathways in skin cancer.

Authors:  F R de Gruijl; H J van Kranen; L H Mullenders
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.252

7.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling facilitates nucleotide excision repair of UV-induced DNA lesions in synthetic dinucleosomes.

Authors:  K Ura; M Araki; H Saeki; C Masutani; T Ito; S Iwai; T Mizukoshi; Y Kaneda; F Hanaoka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Excision repair at the level of the nucleotide in the upstream control region, the coding sequence and in the region where transcription terminates of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MFA2 gene and the role of RAD26.

Authors:  Y Teng; R Waters
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Genomic heterogeneity of nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  A S Balajee; V A Bohr
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Defective transcription-coupled repair of oxidative base damage in Cockayne syndrome patients from XP group G.

Authors:  P K Cooper; T Nouspikel; S G Clarkson; S A Leadon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Use of the comet-FISH assay to compare DNA damage and repair in p53 and hTERT genes following ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Declan J McKenna; Bernadette A Doherty; C Stephen Downes; Stephanie R McKeown; Valerie J McKelvey-Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Defective DNA repair and chromatin organization in patients with quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Vassilis L Souliotis; Konstantinos Vougas; Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Petros P Sfikakis
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.156

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.