Literature DB >> 14530224

Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib versus naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial.

Jeffrey R Lisse1, Monica Perlman, Gunnar Johansson, James R Shoemaker, Joy Schechtman, Carol S Skalky, Mary E Dixon, Adam B Polis, Arthur J Mollen, Gregory P Geba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity mediated by dual cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 inhibition of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause serious alterations of mucosal integrity or, more commonly, intolerable GI symptoms that may necessitate discontinuation of therapy. Unlike NSAIDs, rofecoxib targets only the COX-2 isoform.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerability of rofecoxib compared with naproxen for treatment of osteoarthritis.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: 600 office and clinical research sites. PATIENTS: 5557 patients (mean age, 63 years) with a baseline diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee, hip, hand, or spine. INTERVENTION: Rofecoxib, 25 mg/d, or naproxen, 500 mg twice daily. Use of routine medications, including aspirin, was permitted. MEASUREMENTS: Discontinuation due to GI adverse events (primary end point) and use of concomitant medication to treat GI symptoms (secondary end point). Efficacy was determined by patient-reported global assessment of disease status and the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index, as well as discontinuations due to lack of efficacy. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12.
RESULTS: Rates of cumulative discontinuation due to GI adverse events were statistically significantly lower in the rofecoxib group than in the naproxen group (5.9% vs. 8.1%; relative risk, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92]; P = 0.005), as were rates of cumulative use of medication to treat GI symptoms (9.1% vs. 11.2%; relative risk, 0.79 [CI, 0.66 to 0.96]; P = 0.014]). Subgroup analysis of patients who used low-dose aspirin (13%) and those who previously discontinued using arthritis medication because of GI symptoms (15%) demonstrated a relative risk similar to the overall sample for discontinuation due to GI adverse events (relative risk, 0.56 [CI, 0.31 to 1.01] and 0.53 [CI, 0.34 to 0.84], respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed between treatments for efficacy in treating osteoarthritis or for occurrence of other adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with osteoarthritis treated for 12 weeks, rofecoxib, 25 mg/d, was as effective as naproxen, 500 mg twice daily, but had statistically significantly superior GI tolerability and led to less use of concomitant GI medications. Benefits of rofecoxib in subgroup analyses were consistent with findings in the overall sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530224     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  24 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trials of COX-2 inhibitors: an analysis of doses used and trends over time to investigate implications for comparative safety.

Authors:  Gudrun Stefansdottir; Marie L De Bruin; Mirjam J Knol; Diederick E Grobbee; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Gastroprotective strategies among NSAID users: guidelines for appropriate use in chronic illness.

Authors:  Laura E Targownik; Peter A Thomson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Does family medicine have a professional obligation to play a leading role in pharmaceutical industry-sponsored drug research?: no.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Comparative evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis on recommended doses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  John Fabule; Ade Adebajo
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  NMI-1182, a gastro-protective cyclo-oxygenase-inhibiting nitric oxide donor.

Authors:  James L Ellis; Michael E Augustyniak; Edward D Cochran; Richard A Earl; David S Garvey; Laura J Gordon; David R Janero; Subhash P Khanapure; L Gordon Letts; Terry L Melim; Madhavi G Murty; David J Schwalb; Matthew J Shumway; William M Selig; A Mark Trocha; Delano V Young; Irina S Zemtseva
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  A survey of inclusion of the time element when reporting adverse effects in randomised controlled trials of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors.

Authors:  Y Yazici; H Yazici
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Diet and Exercise for Overweight and Obese Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Karen C Smith; A David Paltiel; Jamie E Collins; Lisa G Suter; David J Hunter; Jeffrey N Katz; Stephen P Messier
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 8.  NSAID-associated adverse effects and acid control aids to prevent them: a review of current treatment options.

Authors:  Jørgen Naesdal; Kurt Brown
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  A comparison of cost effectiveness using data from randomized trials or actual clinical practice: selective cox-2 inhibitors as an example.

Authors:  Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa; Hubert G Leufkens; Bill Zhang; Liam Smeeth
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Rheumatology and musculoskeletal medicine.

Authors:  Graham Davenport
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.