Literature DB >> 14530206

Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.

M Dalby1, A Bouzamondo, P Lechat, G Montalescot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over thrombolysis has been clearly demonstrated in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the best therapeutic strategy for a patient with AMI presenting to acute care services without catheterization facilities remains under debate. Our objective was to gather all available information from clinical trials comparing transfer of patients experiencing AMI for angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis of all data available from published randomized trials and from presentations in scientific sessions of major cardiology congresses comparing the 2 strategies. The primary end point was the combined criteria (CC) of death/reinfarction/stroke as defined in each trial. Relative risk (RR) evaluated the treatment effect. We identified 6 clinical trials including 3750 patients. Transfer time was always <3 hours. The CC was significantly reduced by 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29% to 53%, P<0.001) in the group transferred for primary PCI compared with the group receiving on-site thrombolysis. When CC parameters were considered separately, reinfarction was significantly reduced by 68% (95% CI, 34% to 84%; P<0.001) and stroke by 56% (95% CI, -15% to 77%; P=0.015). There was a trend toward reduction in all-cause mortality of 19% (95% CI, -3% to 36%; P=0.08) with transfer for PCI.
CONCLUSIONS: Even when transfer to an angioplasty center is necessary, primary PCI remains superior to immediate thrombolysis. Organization of ambulance systems, prehospital management, and adequate PCI capacity appear now to be the key issues in providing reperfusion therapy for AMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530206     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091088.63921.8C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  44 in total

1.  Summary of recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Montalescot; H R Andersen; D Antoniucci; A Betriu; M J de Boer; L Grip; F J Neumann; M T Rothman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The trials and tribulations of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals without on-site CABG surgery.

Authors:  Scott Kinlay
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Regionalization of care for acute coronary syndromes: more evidence is needed.

Authors:  Saif S Rathore; Andrew J Epstein; Kevin G M Volpp; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Should patients with acute ST elevation MI be transferred for primary PCI?

Authors:  S D Kristensen; H R Andersen; L Thuesen; L R Krusell; H E Bøtker; J F Lassen; T T Nielsen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Myocardial infarction centres: the way forward.

Authors:  H R Andersen; C J Terkelsen; L Thuesen; L R Krusell; S D Kristensen; H E Bøtker; J F Lassen; T T Nielsen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Assessing the effectiveness of primary angioplasty compared with thrombolysis and its relationship to time delay: a Bayesian evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Christian Asseburg; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Stephen Palmer; Elisabeth Fenwick; Mark de Belder; Keith R Abrams; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario Consensus Report.

Authors:  Marino Labinaz; Terri Swabey; Randal Watson; Madhu Natarajan; Wendy Fucile; Bruce Lubelsky; Bruce Sawadsky; Eric Cohen; Kevin Glasgow
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Why and when PCI, why and when thrombolysis?: PCI.

Authors:  Maddalena Lettino
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 9.  Reperfusion options in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected delays.

Authors:  David M Larson; Timothy D Henry
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  [Thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Current role in the light of recent studies].

Authors:  H-R Arntz; U Zeymer; P Schwimmbeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.