Literature DB >> 14530160

Time factor for acute tissue reactions following fractionated irradiation: a balance between repopulation and enhanced radiosensitivity.

J W Hopewell1, J Nyman, I Turesson.   

Abstract

Experimental data for acute radiation-induced skin reactions are reviewed. These show that for dose fractionation schedules with gaps, repopulation is initiated after a lag period. After this lag period, the isoeffective dose for a given level of skin reaction first increases rapidly, but then slows. The timing of the lag period is related to the total turnover time of the tissue under investigation and, for example, is shorter in rodent skin than in pig or human skin. At the point when accelerated repopulation is initiated, there is a major shortening of the turnover time of the target cell population. At this time, there is evidence, for a short period, for an increase in radiosensitivity of the surviving stem cells in a number of acutely responding normal tissues. This effect is clearly illustrated by the results of experiments using sequential dose fractionation schedules. Prolongation of the schedule from 'short' to schedules that include irradiation over the period when the cell turnover is accelerated is associated with a marked increase in tissue radiosensitivity. Clinically, this is best illustrated by a comparison of the effects of accelerated fractionation schedules, involving multiple fractions/day, with daily fractionation schedules. The increase in radiosensitivity produced by the prolongation of the treatment from 2 to 4-5 weeks was equivalent to > or =1 Gy day(-1). Comparable findings were obtained from animal studies. In the oral mucosa of mice, the initiation of accelerated cell proliferation in surviving cells is associated with the loss of dose sparing by subsequent dose fractionation due to the loss of the capacity to repair sublethal damage. Studies in pig and human skin have indicated that increased radiosensitivity is associated with a loss of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. A collation of these two sets of findings suggests that the repair of sublethal damage takes place over this phase of the cell cycle. One clinical implication of these findings is that the alpha/beta ratio for acute skin reaction changes with the length of the overall treatment time; it is approximately 4.0 Gy for 'short' fractionation schedules that avoid any shortening of the cell cycle time. This increases to 11.2-13.3 Gy for schedules given in 3-4 weeks and to approximately 35 Gy for schedules given in 5-6 weeks. Results for pig skin were in total agreement with those for human skin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530160     DOI: 10.1080/09553000310001600907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  14 in total

1.  Solid tumor risks after high doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Cell death-stimulated cell proliferation: a tissue regeneration mechanism usurped by tumors during radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mary A Zimmerman; Qian Huang; Fang Li; Xinjiang Liu; Chuan-Yuan Li
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 3.  The evolution of practical radiobiological modelling.

Authors:  B Jones; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Acute toxicity of image-guided hypofractionated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Koichiro Nakajima; Hiromitsu Iwata; Hiroyuki Ogino; Yukiko Hattori; Shingo Hashimoto; Mikiko Nakanishi; Toshiyuki Toshito; Yukihiro Umemoto; Shoichiro Iwatsuki; Yuta Shibamoto; Jun-Etsu Mizoe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The effect of short radiation treatment breaks on chemo-radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  Alisa Rybkin; Jung Julie Kang; Anna Lee; Sarin Kitpanit; Ming Fan; Nader Mohamed; Olivia Cartano; Kaveh Zakeri; Daphna Gelblum; Eric Sherman; Lara Dunn; Jay Boyle; Richard Wong; Linda Chen; Yao Yu; Sean M McBride; C Jillian Tsai; Nadeem Riaz; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Dermatopathology effects of simulated solar particle event radiation exposure in the porcine model.

Authors:  Jenine K Sanzari; Eric S Diffenderfer; Sarah Hagan; Paul C Billings; Daila S Gridley; John T Seykora; Ann R Kennedy; Keith A Cengel
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2015-06-18

Review 7.  Addressing the Symptoms or Fixing the Problem? Developing Countermeasures against Normal Tissue Radiation Injury.

Authors:  Jacqueline P Williams; Laura Calvi; Joe V Chakkalakal; Jacob N Finkelstein; M Kerry O'Banion; Edward Puzas
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Mitigation of Lethal Radiation Syndrome in Mice by Intramuscular Injection of 3D Cultured Adherent Human Placental Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Elena Gaberman; Lena Pinzur; Lilia Levdansky; Maria Tsirlin; Nir Netzer; Zami Aberman; Raphael Gorodetsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Cyclooxygenase-2: A Role in Cancer Stem Cell Survival and Repopulation of Cancer Cells during Therapy.

Authors:  Lisa Y Pang; Emma A Hurst; David J Argyle
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 10.  Genomic and Histopathological Tissue Biomarkers That Predict Radiotherapy Response in Localised Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Wilkins; David Dearnaley; Navita Somaiah
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.