Literature DB >> 14529321

Breast cancer: new technologies for risk assessment and diagnosis.

Tracey Wright1, Adam McGechan.   

Abstract

In the US, one in every eight women will develop breast cancer in her lifetime. Despite the advances made in treating breast cancer, the causal mechanisms underlying this disease have yet to be fully elucidated; 85% of breast cancer cases occur sporadically without any known genetic mutation. Too little is known about the pathogenesis of breast cancer for primary prevention to be feasible in the near- to mid-term. Secondary prevention through screening offers an alternative that has been widely adopted. For decades, breast self-examination has been touted as a technique for the early identification of breast cancer. However, it has been recently suggested that this technique is a waste of time and resources for both doctors and patients. Mammography finds breast cancer earlier than breast self-examination, and will reduce the risk of death from breast cancer by approximately 30% in women over 50 years old. Mammography is limited in that cancer, like breast tissue, appears white on the x-ray; therefore lesions may be difficult to detect in women with very dense breasts, and a tumor may not cast a significant shadow until it is quite large. Some cancers are so aggressive that they can spread quickly, before routine screening can detect them. Despite these limitations, mammography is still viewed as the best tool currently available for screening and early diagnosis. Improved methods to detect and diagnose breast cancer early, when it is most curable, are required if a significant impact on morbidity and mortality from breast cancer is to be made. Various new and innovative technologies are being investigated for improving the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. About 85% of breast cancers begin in the milk ductal system of the breast. As cancer develops in the breast, abnormalities occur, including atypical hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive breast carcinoma. Thus, the early screening of ductal cells can provide a parallel benefit to the 'Pap' smear, which is used virtually universally to identify the abnormal cells that can lead to cervical cancer. Two technologies to monitor for atypical ductal epithelial cells are Cytyc Corporation's FirstCyte Ductal Lavage system and Nastech Pharmaceutical Company's Mammary Aspiration Cytology Test. Matritech, Inc. is searching for biomarkers linked to breast cancer. Researchers at Matritech have detected the presence of nuclear matrix protein (NMP) in the blood of women at the early stage of breast cancer, which is absent in the blood of healthy women, as well as those with fibroadenoma, a benign breast disease. NMP66 has been selected as a marker for further development and clinical trials of a test for use in the detection and monitoring of women with, or at risk for, breast cancer have been initiated. Technologies developed by the US Department of Defense are under investigation as breast cancer screening. Advanced Image Enhancement, Inc. has licensed naval sonar technology for digital image enhancement of mammograms. New thermography applications are also being investigated in two separate projects sponsored by the US Department of Defense using military thermal surveillance tools adapted for cancer detection. Both are enhancements of older thermal imaging technology based on the principle that heat equates to unwanted activity, in the case of breast cancer, abnormal cell proliferation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529321     DOI: 10.1007/bf03260021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1084-8592


  41 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer--interaction between ethnicity and environment.

Authors:  G Maskarinec
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  A prospective study of major dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  P Terry; R Suzuki; F B Hu; A Wolk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  The relationship between obesity and breast cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Junaidah B Barnett
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Marchbanks; Jill A McDonald; Hoyt G Wilson; Suzanne G Folger; Michele G Mandel; Janet R Daling; Leslie Bernstein; Kathleen E Malone; Giske Ursin; Brian L Strom; Sandra A Norman; Phyllis A Wingo; Ronald T Burkman; Jesse A Berlin; Michael S Simon; Robert Spirtas; Linda K Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Obesity, body size, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative (United States).

Authors:  Libby M Morimoto; Emily White; Z Chen; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jennifer Hays; Lewis Kuller; Ana Marie Lopez; JoAnn Manson; Karen L Margolis; Paola C Muti; Marcia L Stefanick; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Dietary fat, fat subtypes, and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  E Velie; M Kulldorff; C Schairer; G Block; D Albanes; A Schatzkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Cancer incidence among first generation Scottish, Irish, West Indian and South Asian migrants living in England and Wales.

Authors:  S Harding; M Rosato
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  1999 Feb-May       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Long-term impact of reproductive factors on the risk of cervical, endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer.

Authors:  I Mogren; H Stenlund; U Högberg
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven A Narod; Laura Van't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Alcohol intake, drinking patterns and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in Denmark: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Tjønneland; Birthe L Thomsen; Connie Stripp; Jane Christensen; Kim Overvad; Lene Mellemkaer; Morten Grønbaek; Jørgen H Olsen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  HER2/neu protein expression and fine needle breast aspiration from Argentinean patients with non-palpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Wendy Gabriela Domínguez; Héctor Nardi; Héctor Montero; Esteban Vincent; María Marta Corte; Gabriela Andrea Balogh
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  "Hippocrates-mst": a prototype for computer-aided microcalcification analysis and risk assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  George Spyrou; Smaragda Kapsimalakou; Antonis Frigas; Konstantinos Koufopoulos; Stamatios Vassilaros; Panos Ligomenides
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Early detection of breast cancer: new biomarker tests on the horizon?

Authors:  Aparna C Jotwani; Julie R Gralow
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  Resolving breast cancer heterogeneity by searching reliable protein cancer biomarkers in the breast fluid secretome.

Authors:  Ferdinando Mannello; Daniela Ligi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Identification of risk factors for breast cancer for women in istanbul.

Authors:  Sevim Celik; Güler Aksoy
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2007-08-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.