Literature DB >> 14529305

Optimization of physical dose distributions with hadron beams: comparing photon IMRT with IMPT.

U Oelfke1, T Bortfeld.   

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiotherapy with high enery photons (IMRT) and with charged particles (IMPT) refer to the most advanced development in conformal radiation therapy. Their general aim is to increase local tumor control rates while keeping the radiation induced complications below desired thresholds. IMRT is currently widely introduced in clinical practice. However, the more complicated IMPT is still under development. Especially, spot- scanning techniques integrated in rotating gantries that can deliver proton or light ion-beams to a radiation target from any direction will be available in the near future. We describe the basic concepts of intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT). Starting from the potential advantages of hadron therapy inverse treatment planning strategies are discussed for various dose delivery techniques of IMPT. Of special interest are the techniques of distal edge tracking (DET) and 3D-scanning. After the introduction of these concepts a study of comparative inverse treatment planning is presented. The study aims to identify the potential advantages of achievable physical dose distributions with proton and carbon beams, if different dose delivery techniques are employed. Moreover, a comparison to standard photon IMRT is performed. The results of the study are summarized as: i) IMRT with photon beams is a strong competitor to intensity modulated radiotherapy with charged particles. The most obvious benefit observed for charged particles is the reduction of medium and low doses in organs at risk. ii) The 3D-scanning technique could not improve the dosimetric results achieved with DET, although 10-15 times more beam spots were employed for 3D-scanning than for DET. However, concerns may arise about the application of DET, if positioning errors of the patient or organ movements have to be accounted for. iii) Replacing protons with carbon ions leads to further improvements of the physical dose distributions. However, the additional degree of improvement due to carbon ions is modest. The main clinical potential of heavy ion beams is probably related to their radiobiological properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529305     DOI: 10.1177/153303460300200505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of MCNPX and Geant4 proton energy deposition predictions for clinical use.

Authors:  U Titt; B Bednarz; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The energy margin strategy for reducing dose variation due to setup uncertainty in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) delivered with distal edge tracking (DET).

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Ryan T Flynn; Xiaohu Mo; Thomas Rock Mackie
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  Particle therapy in Europe.

Authors:  Cai Grau; Marco Durante; Dietmar Georg; Johannes A Langendijk; Damien C Weber
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 7.449

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.