Literature DB >> 14528621

The evolutionary roots of our environmental problems: toward a Darwinian ecology.

Dustin J Penn1.   

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that we need to stabilize population growth and reduce our environmental impact; however, there is little consensus about how we might achieve these changes. Here I show how evolutionary analyses of human behavior provide important, though generally ignored, insights into our environmental problems. First, I review increasing evidence that Homo sapiens has a long history of causing ecological problems. This means that, contrary to popular belief, our species' capacity for ecological destruction is not simply due to "Western" culture. Second, I provide an overview of how evolutionary research can help to understand why humans are ecologically destructive, including the reasons why people often overpopulate, overconsume, exhaust common-pool resources, discount the future, and respond maladaptively to modern environmental hazards. Evolutionary approaches not only explain our darker sides, they also provide insights into why people cherish plants and animals and often support environmental and conservation efforts (e.g., Wilson's "biophilia hypothesis"). Third, I show how evolutionary analyses of human behavior offer practical implications for environmental policy, education, and activism. I suggest that education is necessary but insufficient because people also need incentives. Individual incentives are likely to be the most effective, but these include much more than narrow economic interests (e.g., they include one's reputation in society). Moralizing and other forms of social pressure used by environmentalists to bring about change appear to be effective, but this idea needs more research. Finally, I suggest that integrating evolutionary perspectives into the environmental sciences will help to break down the artificial barriers that continue to divide the biological and social sciences, which unfortunately obstruct our ability to understand ourselves and effectively address our environmental problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528621     DOI: 10.1086/377051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  10 in total

Review 1.  An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation.

Authors:  Richard M Cowling; Benis Egoh; Andrew T Knight; Patrick J O'Farrell; Belinda Reyers; Mathieu Rouget; Dirk J Roux; Adam Welz; Angelika Wilhelm-Rechman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Managing the urban commons: the relative influence of individual and social incentives on the treatment of public space.

Authors:  Daniel Tumminelli O'Brien
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-12

3.  The adaptive nature of culture. A cross-cultural analysis of the returns of local environmental knowledge in three indigenous societies.

Authors:  Victoria Reyes-García; Maximilien Guèze; Isabel Díaz-Reviriego; Romain Duda; Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares; Sandrine Gallois; Lucentezza Napitupulu; Martí Orta-Martínez; Aili Pyhälä
Journal:  Curr Anthropol       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 4.  Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition.

Authors:  Linda Steg; Goda Perlaviciute; Ellen van der Werff
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-17

5.  The Handicap Principle: how an erroneous hypothesis became a scientific principle.

Authors:  Dustin J Penn; Szabolcs Számadó
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2019-10-23

6.  Populated Places and Conspicuous Consumption: High Population Density Cues Predict Consumers' Luxury-Linked Brand Attitudes.

Authors:  Tobias Otterbring; Michał Folwarczny; Lynn K L Tan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  Intergenerational fairness: lessons from pandemic contexts.

Authors:  George Kodimattam Joseph; Farhat Naz
Journal:  SN Soc Sci       Date:  2022-09-27

8.  Competition over personal resources favors contribution to shared resources in human groups.

Authors:  Jessica L Barker; Pat Barclay; H Kern Reeve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do natural landscapes reduce future discounting in humans?

Authors:  Arianne J van der Wal; Hannah M Schade; Lydia Krabbendam; Mark van Vugt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The genetic and cultural evolution of unsustainability.

Authors:  Brian F Snyder
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.367

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.