Literature DB >> 14528620

Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups.

Heather Becker1, Greg Roberts, Wayne Voelmeck.   

Abstract

A true experimental design with random assignment to groups protects against false causal inferences that could be made when both the treatment and control groups change because of factors such as testing effects, reactivity, contamination, maturation, history, and other measurement effects. The occurrence of these phenomena, however, provides interesting information about factors affecting health care attitudes, knowledge, and behavior change, which can interfere with a nursing study's ability to demonstrate an experimental effect. In this article, we discuss these design threats, illustrate them with examples from recent health research, and suggest strategies for decreasing them in clinical nursing studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528620     DOI: 10.1177/0193945903253002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.967


  15 in total

1.  A Matched Control Trial of a Mental Health Literacy Intervention for Parents in Community Sports Clubs.

Authors:  Diarmuid Hurley; Mark S Allen; Christian Swann; Stewart A Vella
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2021-02

2.  Measurement Reactivity in a Randomized Clinical Trial Using Self-Reported Data.

Authors:  Jahaira Capellan; Mary H Wilde; Feng Zhang
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  Influence of patients' requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein; Mitchell D Feldman; Carol E Franz; Rahman Azari; Michael S Wilkes; Ladson Hinton; Peter Franks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Informant-related effects of neurofeedback and cognitive training in children with ADHD including a waiting control phase: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Franziska Minder; Agnieszka Zuberer; Daniel Brandeis; Renate Drechsler
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Mood, Meth, Condom Use, and Gender: Latent Growth Curve Modeling Results from a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Eileen V Pitpitan; Shirley J Semple; Jim Zians; Steffanie A Strathdee; Thomas L Patterson
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-09

6.  Self-management support in "real-world" settings: an empowerment-based intervention.

Authors:  Tricia S Tang; Martha M Funnell; Morton B Brown; Jacob E Kurlander
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-11-03

7.  Controlled trial of nursing interventions to improve health outcomes of older African American women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Anne H Skelly; John Carlson; Jennifer Leeman; April Soward; Dorothy Burns
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 8.  Weight change in control group participants in behavioural weight loss interventions: a systematic review and meta-regression study.

Authors:  Lauren Waters; Alexis S George; Tien Chey; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Characteristics of control group participants who increased their physical activity in a cluster-randomized lifestyle intervention trial.

Authors:  Lauren A Waters; Marina M Reeves; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Elizabeth G Eakin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Effects of a Modified Tap Dance Program on Ankle Function and Postural Control in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Qianwen Wang; Yanan Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.