Literature DB >> 14528542

Norms and prenorms on prenatal diagnosis: new ways to deal with morality in counseling.

D van Berkel1, C van der Weele.   

Abstract

This paper consists of two parts. In the first part, we report the results of an empirical study on Dutch women's decisions about prenatal diagnosis. We were interested in the norms these women used as guidance. One clear norm was found that was shared by everyone: everybody should decide for herself. Despite this clear norm, almost all women expressed difficulty with the choice, often regretted the fact that they had to make it and sometimes even expressed disgust about having to choose. These findings indicate that the choice is often experienced as a burden, which we think should be taken more seriously. In the second part of the paper, we present a way to do so. The core of our proposal is to pay more attention in counseling to the moral character of choices about prenatal diagnosis. We discuss difficulties and possibilities in that direction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 14528542     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00137-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  2 in total

1.  Ambivalence toward undergoing invasive prenatal testing: an exploration of its origins.

Authors:  Julie Chevalier Sapp; Sara Chandros Hull; Shelby Duffer; Sarah Zornetzer; Erica Sutton; Theresa M Marteau; Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Professional ambivalence: accounts of ethical practice in childhood genetic testing.

Authors:  Michael Arribas-Ayllon; Srikant Sarangi; Angus Clarke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.