Literature DB >> 14527992

CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection.

Remy W F Geenen1, Shahid M Hussain, Filippo Cademartiri, Jan-Werner Poley, Peter D Siersema, Gabriel P Krestin.   

Abstract

In the last decade, computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) colonography, two new cross-sectional techniques for imaging of the colon, emerged. Both techniques show promising initial results in the detection of polyps equal to or greater than 1 cm in diameter in symptomatic patients. Imaging protocols are still mostly under development and prone to change. Both CT and MR colonography generate a large number of source images, which have to be read carefully for filling defects and, if intravenous contrast material is used, enhancing lesions. An important postprocessing technique is multiplanar reformatting, which allows the viewer to see potential lesions in an orientation other than that of the source images. Virtual endoscopy, a volume rendering technique that generates images from within the colon lumen, is used for problem solving. CT and MR colonography have potential advantages over colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema examination: multiplanar capabilities, detection of enhancing lesions that make the distinction between fecal residue and true lesion possible, and ante- and retrograde virtual colonoscopy. Currently, a number of studies suggest that patients have a preference for CT colonography over colonoscopy. Patients consider bowel cleansing the most uncomfortable part of any colon examination; hence, from the acceptance point of view, fecal tagging techniques are promising. Before CT and MR colonography can be implemented in daily practice, they must show approximately the same accuracy as colonoscopy for polyp detection in both symptomatic and screening patients. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14527992     DOI: 10.1148/rg.e18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  5 in total

1.  Bimodal visualization of colorectal uptake of nanoparticles in dimethylhydrazine-treated mice.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Wei-Liang Zheng; Shi-Zheng Zhang; Ji-Hong Sun; Hong Yuan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  New serological biomarkers of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Xuhang Li; Laurie Conklin; Philip Alex
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.

Authors:  Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zoepf; Michael Nuefer; Florian Grabellus; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  CT colonography in detection of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Amela Sofic; Serif Beslic; Igor Kocijancic; Nedzad Sehovic
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Radiologic Imaging Modalities for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Wen Liu; An-Rong Zeng; Han-Zhou Tang; Jin-Wei Qiang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.487

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.