Literature DB >> 1452799

A comparison of delmopinol and chlorhexidine on plaque regrowth over a 4-day period and salivary bacterial counts.

J Moran1, M Addy, W G Wade, J H Maynard, S E Roberts, M Aström, R Movert.   

Abstract

Delmopinol has been considered as a potential agent for the chemical control of plaque. The aims of these studies were to measure the effects of a 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride mouthrinse on (1) plaque reformation and (2) salivary bacterial counts. Comparisons were made with a 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse and a placebo rinse. A group of 12 male volunteers took part in the plaque study which was of a double blind, randomised, 3 cell, cross-over design. From a zero plaque baseline subjects rinsed, 2x a day, under supervision, for 1 min with 10-ml volumes of the allocated rinse. After 4 days, during which no other form of oral hygiene was performed, plaque was scored by area and index. Plaque results were significantly lower with chlorhexidine and delmopinol compared with control, and with chlorhexidine compared to delmopinol. Side-effects with delmopinol were transient tingling and numbness of the tongue in some subjects. A 2nd group of 12 male volunteers received single, 1-min rinses of the 3 formulations. Salivary bacterial counts were determined immediately before and up to 420 min after rinsing. Compared to the control rinse, chlorhexidine significantly reduced bacterial counts of 420 min. Delmopinol produced a small reduction in bacterial counts which was only significantly different from control at one time point. Delmopinol deserves further evaluation as a chemical plaque inhibitor, particularly when used as an adjunct to normal toothcleaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1452799     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb02165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  3 in total

1.  In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria.

Authors:  Maria Consuelo Cousido; Inmaculada Tomás Carmona; Lucia García-Caballero; Jacobo Limeres; Maximiliano Alvarez; Pedro Diz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Antibacterial and antiplaque efficacy of a commercially available octenidine-containing mouthrinse.

Authors:  Alexander Welk; Maral Zahedani; Carolin Beyer; Axel Kramer; Gerald Müller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Determining the antibacterial substantivity of Triphala mouthwash and comparing it with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate after a single oral rinse: A crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Ritam Sanvala Naiktari; Chandrakant Dharmadhikari; Abhijit Ningappa Gurav; Satish Kakade
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.