Literature DB >> 14527705

BOLD effects in different areas of the cerebral cortex during painful mechanical stimulation.

R Ringler1, M Greiner, L Kohlloeffel, O H Handwerker, C Forster.   

Abstract

The contribution of four cortical areas (S1, S2, insular cortex and gyrus cinguli) to pain processing was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Phasic (mechanical impact) and tonic stimuli (squeezing) were applied to the back of a finger, both at two different strengths. Stimuli were adjusted to inflict weak and strong pain sensations. It had been shown before that stronger noxious mechanical stimuli induce a weaker input from myelinated mechanoreceptors, but a more vigorous input from nociceptive primary afferents, and vice versa. Sizes of activation clusters and percent increase of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal during activation were compared in the areas of interest. Phasic stimulus patterns were more closely reflected in the time course of the MR signal in S1, S2 and the cingulate than tonic patterns, since the tonic stimuli tended to induce slow MR signal increase also during the resting periods which is in parallel to the persisting character of the tonic pain sensations. In S1 only the contralateral side was activated in most cases, and the more painful stimuli did not induce greater BOLD responses compared to the less painful stimuli in this area. Paradoxically, more painful stimuli produced smaller activation clusters in S1, both in tonic and phasic stimulus trials. In contralateral S2 more painful phasic stimuli induced significantly stronger BOLD responses than the weaker stimuli. The responses to tonic stimuli did not differentiate painfulness and were significantly smaller than the phasic. Activation clusters in this area were also smaller for tonic stimuli. In the gyrus cinguli more painful phasic stimuli induced stronger BOLD responses, but no difference was seen between tonic stimulation of different strength. Though the insular cortex was often bilaterally activated, no significant differences between stimulus quality or intensity were found. Our results provide evidence for a contribution of the S2 projection area and of the cingulate cortex to the processing of the intensity dimension of phasic mechanical pain. Such evidence was not found for the S1 area, which probably receives dominant input from non-nociceptive mechanoreceptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14527705     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00258-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  15 in total

1.  Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue?

Authors:  India Morrison; Donna Lloyd; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Neil Roberts
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  BOLD responses in somatosensory cortices better reflect heat sensation than pain.

Authors:  Eric A Moulton; Gautam Pendse; Lino R Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Unique, common, and interacting cortical correlates of thirst and pain.

Authors:  Michael J Farrell; Gary F Egan; Frank Zamarripa; Robert Shade; John Blair-West; Peter Fox; Derek A Denton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  BOLD fMRI deactivation of limbic and temporal brain structures and mood enhancing effect by transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  T Kraus; K Hösl; O Kiess; A Schanze; J Kornhuber; C Forster
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Treatment-related changes in brain activation in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  Martin Diers; Pinar Yilmaz; Mariela Rance; Kati Thieme; Richard H Gracely; Claudia Rolko; Marcus T Schley; Ulrike Kiessling; Haili Wang; Herta Flor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Neural activity related to self- versus externally generated painful stimuli reveals distinct differences in the lateral pain system in a parametric fMRI study.

Authors:  Christoph Helmchen; Christian Mohr; Christian Erdmann; F Binkofski; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Common neural systems for contact heat and laser pain stimulation reveal higher-level pain processing.

Authors:  Christoph Helmchen; Christian Mohr; Meike Roehl; U Bingel; Juergen Lorenz; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A dynamic network involving M1-S1, SII-insular, medial insular, and cingulate cortices controls muscular activity during an isometric contraction reaction time task.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Jouanin; Michel Pérès; Antoine Ducorps; Bernard Renault
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Human brain activity associated with painful mechanical stimulation to muscle and bone.

Authors:  Lynn Maeda; Mayu Ono; Tetsuo Koyama; Yoshitetsu Oshiro; Masahiko Sumitani; Takashi Mashimo; Masahiko Shibata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Pulsed ultrasound differentially stimulates somatosensory circuits in humans as indicated by EEG and FMRI.

Authors:  Wynn Legon; Abby Rowlands; Alexander Opitz; Tomokazu F Sato; William J Tyler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.