Literature DB >> 14527241

Two advertisements for TV drug ads.

Thomas Bodenheimer1.   

Abstract

The paper by Joel Weissman and colleagues addresses the increasingly important topic of the effects of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) by pharmaceutical companies. The authors claim that their results should be reassuring to "those concerned about potential adverse health care consequences of DTCA". However, the study and analysis of the data are marred by several flaws that diminish the importance and relevance of the findings, including weakness in design, overgenerous interpretations, and failure to address key questions. Rather than informing the debate, the study amounts to little more than an advertisement for drug advertisements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14527241     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  4 in total

1.  Should drug companies be allowed to talk directly to patients? NO.

Authors:  Wendy Garlick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-14

2.  Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising in Canada: permission by default?

Authors:  David M Gardner; Barbara Mintzes; Aleck Ostry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Creating demand for prescription drugs: a content analysis of television direct-to-consumer advertising.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Patrick M Krueger; Robert C Hornik; Peter F Cronholm; Frances K Barg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  How does direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) affect prescribing? A survey in primary care environments with and without legal DTCA.

Authors:  Barbara Mintzes; Morris L Barer; Richard L Kravitz; Ken Bassett; Joel Lexchin; Arminée Kazanjian; Robert G Evans; Richard Pan; Stephen A Marion
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 8.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.