Literature DB >> 14526472

Investigation on the clinical efficacy and safety of meloxicam (Metacam) in the treatment of non-infectious locomotor disorders in pigs.

Gabriele M Friton1, Hagen Philipp, Thomas Schneider, Rainer Kleemann.   

Abstract

The clinical efficacy and safety of meloxicam (Metacam 20 mg/ml) in the treatment of non-infectious locomotor disorders in pigs was investigated in a randomised double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-centre field study. A total of 220 pigs were examined, 211 pigs were suitable for evaluation. Treatment was performed on Day 1 with meloxicam (0.4 mg meloxicam/kg) or placebo by intramuscular injection. If necessary, treatment was optionally repeated on Day 2. Clinical examinations were conducted daily from Day 1 (immediately prior to initiation of therapy) to Day 4. The primary parameter, mean "Clinical Lameness Score" (CLS, a sum of the scores of "Lameness at Rest" and "Lameness at Walk"; range 2 to 11) improved from 6.8 and 6.3 on Day 1, to 3.5 and 4.7 on Day 4 in the meloxicam and placebo groups respectively (p < 0.001). At the final examination mean changes from baseline for CLS (Day 1) were 3.25 for meloxicam treated animals and 1.7 for placebo treated animals (p < 0.001). Behaviour score and feed intake improved during the study period with statistically significant differences in favour of meloxicam at all time points after initiation of therapy. Significantly fewer pigs received a second treatment in the meloxicam group than in the placebo group, 46% versus 73% (p < 0.001). A 'very good' or 'good' clinical efficacy assessment was recorded in 83% of the meloxicam cases compared to 42% of the placebo controls at the final examination (p < 0.001). No adverse events were reported due to the use of meloxicam. Furthermore safety of meloxicam in pregnant sows was demonstrated. It is concluded that intramuscular injection of meloxicam (Metacam) at a dosage of 0.4 mg/kg is efficacious and safe for the treatment of non-infectious locomotor disorders in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14526472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr        ISSN: 0005-9366            Impact factor:   0.328


  5 in total

1.  Removing the threat of diclofenac to critically endangered Asian vultures.

Authors:  Gerry Swan; Vinasan Naidoo; Richard Cuthbert; Rhys E Green; Deborah J Pain; Devendra Swarup; Vibhu Prakash; Mark Taggart; Lizette Bekker; Devojit Das; Jörg Diekmann; Maria Diekmann; Elmarié Killian; Andy Meharg; Ramesh Chandra Patra; Mohini Saini; Kerri Wolter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 2.  Pain assessment in animal models: do we need further studies?

Authors:  Carmelo Gigliuto; Manuela De Gregori; Valentina Malafoglia; William Raffaeli; Christian Compagnone; Livia Visai; Paola Petrini; Maria Antonietta Avanzini; Carolina Muscoli; Jacopo Viganò; Francesco Calabrese; Tommaso Dominioni; Massimo Allegri; Lorenzo Cobianchi
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Lameness in piglets - should pain killers be included at treatment?

Authors:  Mate Zoric; Ulla Schmidt; Anna Wallenbeck; Per Wallgren
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-03-08

Review 4.  A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs.

Authors:  Sarah H Ison; R Eddie Clutton; Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Kenneth M D Rutherford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-28

5.  Open field and a behavior score in PNT model for neuropathic pain in pigs.

Authors:  David Castel; Itai Sabbag; Elvira Nasaev; Sean Peng; Sigal Meilin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.133

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.