OBJECTIVE: Serum cystatin-C, a protein with constant production rate, undergoes glomerular filtration. Cystatin-C is a candidate surrogate marker, allegedly superior to serum creatinine, for estimating glomerular filtration rate, due to its high correlation with absolute measurement of the latter. The aim of this study was to assess from intra- and inter-subject variability the performance of cystatin-C in a cohort of diabetic patients spanning a wide range of kidney function and to compare it to that of serum creatinine. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 98 consecutive diabetic in-patients (45 type 1 and 53 type 2) were included. Mean age was 53 +/- 15 years (1SD). Creatinine clearance was 98 ml/min (median; range: 16-244). We used the discriminant ratio (DR) methodology to compare the performance of serum cystatin-C vs. that of creatinine to segregate subjects according to their glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: Serum creatinine values on day 1 and 2 were 1.10 +/- 0.76 and 1.07 +/- 0.89 mg/dl and concentrations of cystatin-C were 1.10 +/- 0.60 and 1.06 +/- 0.63 mg/L. A close linear relationship was observed between means of duplicates for creatinine and cystatin-C (Pearson product-moment correlation 0.92). DR was obtained from the ratio of the underlying between-subject to the within-subject standard deviations. DR values were 5.23 for creatinine and 8.82 for cystatin-C (P<0.0001), implying superior discriminating ability for cystatin-C. Once adjusted for attenuation, measured Pearson product-moment correlation rose from 0.92 to 0.97. The DR methodology allowed for deriving an unbiased linear regression equation between methods, with slope and intercept at 0.79 and 0.23, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cystatin-C better discriminates among a population of type 1 and 2 diabetic patients with regard to their estimated glomerular filtration rate when compared with conventional serum creatinine measurement.
OBJECTIVE: Serum cystatin-C, a protein with constant production rate, undergoes glomerular filtration. Cystatin-C is a candidate surrogate marker, allegedly superior to serum creatinine, for estimating glomerular filtration rate, due to its high correlation with absolute measurement of the latter. The aim of this study was to assess from intra- and inter-subject variability the performance of cystatin-C in a cohort of diabeticpatients spanning a wide range of kidney function and to compare it to that of serum creatinine. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 98 consecutive diabetic in-patients (45 type 1 and 53 type 2) were included. Mean age was 53 +/- 15 years (1SD). Creatinine clearance was 98 ml/min (median; range: 16-244). We used the discriminant ratio (DR) methodology to compare the performance of serum cystatin-C vs. that of creatinine to segregate subjects according to their glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: Serum creatinine values on day 1 and 2 were 1.10 +/- 0.76 and 1.07 +/- 0.89 mg/dl and concentrations of cystatin-C were 1.10 +/- 0.60 and 1.06 +/- 0.63 mg/L. A close linear relationship was observed between means of duplicates for creatinine and cystatin-C (Pearson product-moment correlation 0.92). DR was obtained from the ratio of the underlying between-subject to the within-subject standard deviations. DR values were 5.23 for creatinine and 8.82 for cystatin-C (P<0.0001), implying superior discriminating ability for cystatin-C. Once adjusted for attenuation, measured Pearson product-moment correlation rose from 0.92 to 0.97. The DR methodology allowed for deriving an unbiased linear regression equation between methods, with slope and intercept at 0.79 and 0.23, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cystatin-C better discriminates among a population of type 1 and 2 diabeticpatients with regard to their estimated glomerular filtration rate when compared with conventional serum creatinine measurement.
Authors: Bruce A Perkins; Robert G Nelson; Betsy E P Ostrander; Kristina L Blouch; Andrzej S Krolewski; Bryan D Myers; James H Warram Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-03-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Catherine T Prince; Aaron M Secrest; Rachel H Mackey; Vincent C Arena; Lawrence A Kingsley; Trevor J Orchard Journal: Diab Vasc Dis Res Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 3.291
Authors: Ana Karina Teixeira da Cunha França; Alcione Miranda Dos Santos; João Victor Salgado; Elane Viana Hortegal; Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva; Natalino Salgado Filho Journal: Int J Nephrol Date: 2014-05-04