BACKGROUND: The principles of a psychological intervention for psychiatric disorders, nidotherapy, are described following its use in the treatment of patients with severe mental illness, most of whom also have personality disorders. Nidotherapy is the collaborative systematic assessment and modification of the environment to minimise the impact of any form of mental disorder on the individual or on society. It is particularly appropriate to consider for chronic and recurring disorders in which there is no prospect of short-term improvement. METHODS: An analysis of the treatment suggests its main tenets are the development of a joint consensus (collateral collocation) of environmental change needed, formulation of targets, consequent monitoring and adjustments made to test the effectiveness of intervention, and a joint structure (arbitrage solving) to adjudicate when changes are considered feasible or impractical by one party and not the other. RESULTS: Case vignettes are used to describe the main features of the treatment. Although nidotherapy includes some of the elements of cognitive, occupational and family therapy, and even social work, it is different in that it focuses on changing the environment, not the person. It is therefore much more acceptable to those patients who have repeatedly challenged the justification of conventional therapy for their conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Nidotherapy deserves further enquiry as a useful addition to existing psychological treatments. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
BACKGROUND: The principles of a psychological intervention for psychiatric disorders, nidotherapy, are described following its use in the treatment of patients with severe mental illness, most of whom also have personality disorders. Nidotherapy is the collaborative systematic assessment and modification of the environment to minimise the impact of any form of mental disorder on the individual or on society. It is particularly appropriate to consider for chronic and recurring disorders in which there is no prospect of short-term improvement. METHODS: An analysis of the treatment suggests its main tenets are the development of a joint consensus (collateral collocation) of environmental change needed, formulation of targets, consequent monitoring and adjustments made to test the effectiveness of intervention, and a joint structure (arbitrage solving) to adjudicate when changes are considered feasible or impractical by one party and not the other. RESULTS: Case vignettes are used to describe the main features of the treatment. Although nidotherapy includes some of the elements of cognitive, occupational and family therapy, and even social work, it is different in that it focuses on changing the environment, not the person. It is therefore much more acceptable to those patients who have repeatedly challenged the justification of conventional therapy for their conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Nidotherapy deserves further enquiry as a useful addition to existing psychological treatments. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Peter Tyrer; Roger Mulder; Mike Crawford; Giles Newton-Howes; Erik Simonsen; David Ndetei; Nestor Koldobsky; Andrea Fossati; Joseph Mbatia; Barbara Barrett Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 49.548