Literature DB >> 14525642

Deep sedation with propofol for children undergoing ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: experience from a pediatric intensive care unit.

Rashed A Hasan1, Jay R Shayevitz, Vipul Patel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Use of intravenous propofol sedation to facilitate completion of magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in children.
DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional.
SETTING: A university-affiliated pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: A total of 115 children who received intravenous propofol to complete magnetic resonance imaging of the brain January 1 through December 31, 2001.
INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous propofol infusion.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean age was 4.2 +/- 3.1 yrs, and there were 63 boys and 52 girls. Sixty-nine percent of patients belonged to ASA physical status class I, and 31% belonged to ASA class II. All studies were completed with satisfactory image quality. The total dose of propofol used to complete a magnetic resonance image of the brain was 4.3 +/- 1.7 mg/kg body weight. The mean duration of sedation induction was 4.5 +/- 3.5 mins. The mean time to recovery (from the end of the procedure) was 20 +/- 15 mins. The duration of the procedure averaged 39 +/- 20 mins, and the time to discharge from the hospital was 50 +/- 21 mins from the end of the procedure. No episodes of hypoxia, apnea, or a need for artificial airway were noted. Systolic blood pressure decreased 10% +/- 13%, but none of the patients met the criteria for hypotension. A telephone call the next day to the family did not reveal any delayed complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol can safely facilitate ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in children, and it is associated with brief induction, recovery, and discharge times from the hospital. A drop in blood pressure, although mild and transient, does occur. Therefore, appropriate monitoring and preparedness for cardiorespiratory support are essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14525642     DOI: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000090013.66899.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  16 in total

1.  Risks of propofol sedation/anesthesia for imaging studies in pediatric research: eight years of experience in a clinical research center.

Authors:  Ruwan Kiringoda; Audrey E Thurm; Matthew E Hirschtritt; Deloris Koziol; Robert Wesley; Susan E Swedo; Naomi P O'Grady; Zenaide M N Quezado
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-06

2.  Prevention of emergence agitation in seven children receiving low-dose ketamine and propofol total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Doralina L Anghelescu; Lauren C Rakes; Jack R Shearer; George B Bikhazi
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2011-06

3.  Low-dose dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to propofol infusion for children in MRI: A double-cohort study.

Authors:  Makoto Nagoshi; Swayta Reddy; Marisa Bell; Allan Cresencia; Rebecca Margolis; Randall Wetzel; Patrick Ross
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.556

4.  New airway device for ventilation and monitoring in pediatric patients undergoing MRI study.

Authors:  Alexander S Matveevskii; Mohamed Mahmoud
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Intermittent Bolus versus Continuous Infusion of Propofol for Deep Sedation during ABR/Nuclear Medicine Studies.

Authors:  Sheikh Sohail Ahmed; Shawn Hicks; James E Slaven; Mara Nitu
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-12-30

6.  Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol: Is One Better Than the Other for MRI Sedation in Children?

Authors:  Sheikh S Ahmed; Tamara L Unland; James E Slaven; Mara E Nitu
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-06-24

7.  Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects in spontaneously breathing children under deep sedation: a feasible and safe concept.

Authors:  Andreas Hanslik; Axel Moysich; K Thorsten Laser; Elisabeth Mlczoch; Deniz Kececioglu; Nikolaus A Haas
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Is procedural sedation with propofol acceptable for complex imaging? A comparison of short vs. prolonged sedations in children.

Authors:  Mark A Griffiths; Pradip P Kamat; Courtney E McCracken; Harold K Simon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-07

9.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine and three different doses of midazolam in preoperative sedation.

Authors:  Gulay Eren; Zafer Cukurova; Guray Demir; Oya Hergunsel; Betul Kozanhan; Nalan S Emir
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07

10.  A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jaydev Dave; Sandip Vaghela
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.