Henry A Glick1, Linda McBride, Mark S Bauer. 1. Division of General Medicine and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Internal State Scale (ISS) is a self-report instrument that allows the simultaneous assessment of both manic and depressive symptoms in individuals with manic-depressive disorder. Prior work indicates that subscales are highly correlated with clinician ratings of mania and depression and provide a discriminant function that identifies individuals in manic/hypomanic, mixed, depressed, and euthymic mood states. A drawback to the ISS is that its items were developed in the visual analogue scale (VAS) format which is labor-intensive to score, particularly with repeat (e.g. daily) administration. A Likert-based format would allow quick and easy optical scanning for which scoring could be automated. METHODS: To compare discriminating properties in Likert versus VAS format we re-analyzed previously collected data and collected new data: (a) VAS-based ISS scores from 86 subjects from a prior four-site study were re-analyzed by collapsing scores into 20 and then 10 Likert-based bins to assess loss of precision from collapsing scores, and (b) 24 additional subjects were administered the ISS in VAS and Likert formats to assess loss of precision due to instrument completion factors. RESULTS: Discriminant ability, including kappas and receiver operator characteristic curves, were unchanged across the two formats. Within-subjects reliability was uniformally high across formats. CONCLUSIONS: Likert-based scoring of the ISS can be used without loss of precision, thus making automated scoring of the ISS feasible. This format will be particularly useful for studies that require processing of large numbers of ISSs, such as those that collect frequent ratings over long periods of time and/or those that utilize large samples.
INTRODUCTION: The Internal State Scale (ISS) is a self-report instrument that allows the simultaneous assessment of both manic and depressive symptoms in individuals with manic-depressive disorder. Prior work indicates that subscales are highly correlated with clinician ratings of mania and depression and provide a discriminant function that identifies individuals in manic/hypomanic, mixed, depressed, and euthymic mood states. A drawback to the ISS is that its items were developed in the visual analogue scale (VAS) format which is labor-intensive to score, particularly with repeat (e.g. daily) administration. A Likert-based format would allow quick and easy optical scanning for which scoring could be automated. METHODS: To compare discriminating properties in Likert versus VAS format we re-analyzed previously collected data and collected new data: (a) VAS-based ISS scores from 86 subjects from a prior four-site study were re-analyzed by collapsing scores into 20 and then 10 Likert-based bins to assess loss of precision from collapsing scores, and (b) 24 additional subjects were administered the ISS in VAS and Likert formats to assess loss of precision due to instrument completion factors. RESULTS: Discriminant ability, including kappas and receiver operator characteristic curves, were unchanged across the two formats. Within-subjects reliability was uniformally high across formats. CONCLUSIONS: Likert-based scoring of the ISS can be used without loss of precision, thus making automated scoring of the ISS feasible. This format will be particularly useful for studies that require processing of large numbers of ISSs, such as those that collect frequent ratings over long periods of time and/or those that utilize large samples.
Authors: Shawna N Smith; Daniel Almirall; Katherine Prenovost; Celeste Liebrecht; Julia Kyle; Daniel Eisenberg; Mark S Bauer; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; David E Goodrich; Kristina M Nord; Celeste Van Poppelen; Julia Kyle; Mark S Bauer; Jeanette A Waxmonsky; Zongshan Lai; Hyungjin M Kim; Daniel Eisenberg; Marshall R Thomas Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2015-09
Authors: Laura A Bajor; Zongshan Lai; David E Goodrich; Christopher J Miller; Robert B Penfold; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Mark S Bauer; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Mario Cruz; Harold Alan Pincus; Deborah E Welsh; Devra Greenwald; Elaine Lasky; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Taylor A Burke; Brae Anne McArthur; Issar Daryanani; Lyn Y Abramson; Lauren B Alloy Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Maria Syl D de la Cruz; Zongshan Lai; David E Goodrich; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Margretta Bramlet; Michelle M Barbaresso; Kristina M Nord; David E Goodrich; Zongshan Lai; Edward P Post; Daniel Almirall; Lilia Verchinina; Sonia A Duffy; Mark S Bauer Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Christopher J Miller; Kristen M Abraham; Laura A Bajor; Zongshan Lai; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Kristina M Nord; David E Goodrich; Mark S Bauer; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Kristen M Abraham; Christopher J Miller; Denis G Birgenheir; Zongshan Lai; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.254