Literature DB >> 1452502

Multiple dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and effects on faecal microflora, of cefepime in healthy volunteers.

K Bächer1, M Schaeffer, H Lode, C E Nord, K Borner, P Koeppe.   

Abstract

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 12 healthy volunteers pharmacokinetics, safety and impact on the faecal microflora of cefepime were determined. For eight days eight volunteers received cefepime 1000 mg bd by constant infusion over 30 min, four volunteers received placebo. Concentrations of cefepime in serum and urine were measured by bioassay and HPLC. The correlation between the two methods was good and the bioassay results were used for pharmacokinetic calculations. The faecal flora was analysed twice before the study, twice during the study and four times after cefepime administration. There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters between days 1 and 8. The following values (mean +/- S.D.) represent day 1. The maximum concentration of 72.69 +/- 12.2 mg/L immediately after infusion decreased to 0.56 +/- 0.17 mg/L after 12 h. The mean 12 h recovery in urine was 93.69 +/- 2.14%. Pharmacokinetic parameters based on an open two-compartment model were as follows (mean +/- S.D.): area under the curve, 142.65 +/- 18.35 mg.h/L; elimination half-life 110.3 +/- 8.3 min; steady state volume of distribution 16.0 +/- 1.9 L/70 kg; total clearance, 107.0 +/- 16.0 mL/min; renal clearance 103.0 +/- 15.2 mL/min. No accumulation was observed during the eight day study period with cefepime at this dosage; trough levels on days 2-7 ranged from 0.52 +/- 0.26 mg/L to 0.90 +/- 0.33 mg/L. In the cefepime treated group the following side-effects were noted: headache (5), fatigue (4), nausea/stomach ache (2), soft stool (2), transient scotoma (1). Side-effects in the placebo group were: headache (2) fatigue (3), nausea/stomach-ache (1), soft stool (2) and photophobia (1). During cefepime administration a decrease in the number of Escherichia coli and bifidobacteria in faeces was observed, whereas Bacteroides spp. and clostridia showed a slight increase. The numbers of faecal bacteria returned to normal 20 to 48 days after the study was completed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1452502     DOI: 10.1093/jac/30.3.365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  10 in total

1.  Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients.

Authors:  C J Donskey; T K Chowdhry; M T Hecker; C K Hoyen; J A Hanrahan; A M Hujer; R A Hutton-Thomas; C C Whalen; R A Bonomo; L B Rice
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Efficacies of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime in rats with experimental intra-abdominal abscesses due to an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  C Thauvin-Eliopoulos; M F Tripodi; R C Moellering; G M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Acute-phase response alters the disposition kinetics of cefepime following intravenous administration to rabbits.

Authors:  A M Abd El-Aty; A Goudah; S M Mouneir; Y E Sunwoo; J H Jang; J G Shin; J H Shim; M Shimoda
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 4.  Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Acquisition of rectal colonization by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus among intensive care unit patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam versus those receiving cefepime-containing antibiotic regimens.

Authors:  David L Paterson; Carlene A Muto; Magdaline Ndirangu; Peter K Linden; Brian A Potoski; Blair Capitano; Robert A Bonomo; David C Aron; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Cefepime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  L B Barradell; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Influence of endotoxin induced fever on the pharmacokinetics of intramuscularly administered cefepime in rabbits.

Authors:  Ayman Goudah; Samar M Mouneir; Jae-Han Shim; A M Abd El-Aty
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  Modelling concentrations of antimicrobial drugs: comparative pharmacokinetics of cephalosporin antimicrobials and accuracy of allometric scaling in food-producing and companion animals.

Authors:  Femke J Taverne; Ingeborg M van Geijlswijk; Dick J J Heederik; Jaap A Wagenaar; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Impact of antimicrobial therapy on the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Tjitske S R van Engelen; Harjeet S Virk; W Joost Wiersinga
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  Human gut microbiota: repertoire and variations.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Matthieu Million; Perrine Hugon; Fabrice Armougom; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 5.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.