Literature DB >> 14520525

Quantitative evaluation of reconstruction methods after gastrectomy using a new type of examination: digestion and absorption test with stable isotope 13C-labeled lipid compound.

Makoto Takase1, Yoshinobu Sumiyama, Jiro Nagao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digestive and absorptive disorders may negatively influence patients' nutrition, thus resulting in weight loss after gastrectomy. A relationship thus seems to exist between the fat absorptive function and body weight after gastrectomy; however, so far there has been no evidence to prove this hypothesis. Therefore, in this study we evaluated fat absorption ability using a stable isotope, (13)C-trioctanoin, based on the range of the gastrectomy and the method of reconstruction, and we also determined the feasibility of this test.
METHODS: Among patients who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer, 40 patients who had been operated on between 1 and 3 years previously were evaluated. Ten patients had undergone the double-tract (DT) method, and 10 patients had received the Roux-en-Y (RY) method after a total gastrectomy. Twenty patients who had undergone the Billroth I (BI) method after a distal gastrectomy were the control group. In addition, 10 volunteers formed a healthy control group for the (13)C-trioctanoin test. We also examined other six factors related to nutrition after gastrectomy. RESULTS. The (13)C-trioctanoin test showed, in relation to the reconstruction procedure, the highest average peak of fat absorption in the BI group (which had food passage through the duodenum), followed by the average peak of fat absorption in the DT group and the RY groups. In a comparison of duration, at 60 min and 90 min after administration, the BI group and DT group showed a significantly higher level than the RY group. The peaking time (average time at peak level) showed a significant difference between the RY group and the other groups. The absorption amount at an early stage of absorption and the percent (%) dose showed a significant difference between the RY group and the other groups. The RY group had significantly lower fat absorption than the healthy controls.
CONCLUSION: According to this study, which evaluated fat absorption after different reconstructive procedures after gastrectomy, the procedure that accommodated for the passage of food through the duodenum showed better results for the absorption of medium-chain triglycerides, and the patients also showed a better physiological state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14520525     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-003-0238-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  11 in total

1.  Novel jejunoduodenostomy technique for prevention of duodenal stump blowout following gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Kalantar Motamedi; Jalaledin Khoshnevis; Mohammad Reza Kalantar Motamedi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A new pouch reconstruction method after total gastrectomy (pouch-double tract method) improved the postoperative quality of life of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masahide Ikeguchi; Hirohiko Kuroda; Hiroaki Saito; Shigeru Tatebe; Toshiro Wakatsuki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Double tract reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer is effective in reducing reflux esophagitis and remnant gastritis with duodenal passage preservation.

Authors:  Tsutomu Namikawa; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Takehiro Okabayashi; Takeki Sugimoto; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Glucose variability and predicted cardiovascular risk after gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jun Shibamoto; Takeshi Kubota; Takuma Ohashi; Hirotaka Konishi; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Kazuma Okamoto; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Is single tract jejunal interposition better than double tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy?

Authors:  Shuaibing Lu; Fei Ma; Wei Yang; Liangqun Peng; Yawei Hua
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-08

6.  Improved quality of life in patients with gastric cancer after esophagogastrostomy reconstruction.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Zhe Sun; Hui-Mian Xu; Ji-Xian Shan; Shu-Bao Wang; Jun-Qing Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Postprandial Asymptomatic Glycemic Fluctuations after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device.

Authors:  Motonari Ri; Souya Nunobe; Satoshi Ida; Naoki Ishizuka; Shinichiro Atsumi; Masaru Hayami; Rie Makuuchi; Koshi Kumagai; Manabu Ohashi; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.720

8.  Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sophia Kristina Rupp; Andreas Stengel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Visceral fat changes after distal gastrectomy according to type of reconstruction procedure for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Koji Tanaka; Isao Miyashiro; Masahiko Yano; Kentaro Kishi; Masaaki Motoori; Tatsushi Shingai; Shingo Noura; Masayuki Ohue; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Osamu Ishikawa
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Following Gastric Resectional Surgery-is Routine Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy Necessary?

Authors:  Rajeevan Philip Sridhar; Myla Yacob; Sudipta Dhar Chowdhury; Kunissery A Balasubramanian; Inian Samarasam
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.