Literature DB >> 14519872

Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen.

Stuart A Taylor1, Steve Halligan, Clive I Bartram, Paul R Morgan, Ian C Talbot, Nicola Fry, Brian P Saunders, Kirosh Khosraviani, Wendy Atkin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of orientation, collimation, pitch, and tube current setting on polyp detection at multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine the optimal combination of scanning parameters for screening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A colectomy specimen containing 117 polyps of different sizes was insufflated and imaged with a multi-detector row CT scanner at various collimation (1.25 and 2.5 mm), pitch (3 and 6), and tube current (50, 100, and 150 mA) settings. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three-dimensional endoluminal surface renderings from the 12 resultant data sets were examined by one observer for the presence and conspicuity of polyps. The results were analyzed with Poisson regression and logistic regression to determine the effects of scanning parameters and of specimen orientation on polyp detection.
RESULTS: The percentage of polyps that were detected significantly increased when collimation (P =.008) and table feed (P =.03) were decreased. Increased tube current resulted in improved detection only of polyps with a diameter of less than 5 mm. Polyps of less than 5 mm were optimally depicted with a collimation of 1.25 mm, a pitch of 3, and a tube current setting of 150 mA; polyps with a diameter greater than 5 mm were adequately depicted with 1.25-mm collimation and with either pitch setting and any of the three tube current settings. Small polyps in the transverse segment (positioned at a 90 degrees angle to the z axis of scanning) were significantly less visible than those in parallel or oblique orientations (P <.001). The effective radiation dose, calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation, was 1.4-10.0 mSv.
CONCLUSION: Detection of small polyps (<5 mm) with multi-detector row CT is highly dependent on collimation, pitch, and, to a lesser extent, tube current. Collimation of 1.25 mm, combined with pitch of 6 and tube current of 50 mA, provides for reliable detection of polyps 5 mm or larger while limiting the effective radiation dose. Polyps smaller than 5 mm, however, may be poorly depicted with use of these settings in the transverse colon. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14519872     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291020561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Urinary calculi: improved detection and characterization with thin-slice multidetector CT.

Authors:  Etienne Ketelslegers; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Rogier E van Gelder; Henk W Venema; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johan S Laméris; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Utility of computed tomographic colonography in surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Arto Kivisaari; Leena Kivisaari; Seppo Sarna; Heikki J Järvinen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

7.  Computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Virendra Tewari; Deepali Tewari; Frank G Gress
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-03

8.  Ultrasound virtual endoscopy: Polyp detection and reliability of measurement in an in vitro study with pig intestine specimens.

Authors:  Jin-Ya Liu; Li-Da Chen; Hua-Song Cai; Jin-Yu Liang; Ming Xu; Yang Huang; Wei Li; Shi-Ting Feng; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system.

Authors:  A Graser; F T Kolligs; T Mang; C Schaefer; S Geisbüsch; M F Reiser; C R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.